On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 16:54, Joshua Marantz jmara...@google.com wrote:
Even in the absence of 'remove_comments', it would be preferable to have
mod_pagespeed run after mod_includes so that it has an opportunity to
optimize the included text. The user can achieve this by putting this line
Thanks, Nick Ben!
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Nick Kew n...@apache.org wrote:
AP_FTYPE_RESOURCE+1. That also leaves an admin the possibility of
overriding it.
I didn't realize these +1/-1 hacks were available for this API. This looks
really simple is the direction I'm leaning.
On Mar 14, 2011, at 3:13 PM, traw...@apache.org wrote:
+ * If no query args were specified, the table will be entry.
entry ? ;)
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 9:32 AM, Brian McCallister bri...@skife.org wrote:
Thank you, I'll take a look into this today!
Thank you, patch applied!
-Brian
2011/3/10 zhiguo zhao zha...@gmail.com:
Hi,
Some days I post my first
I have been wrestling for a while now with how to advance the state of
mod_lua, but still have it be a core module. The key problem is that
mod_lua *isn't* especially mature yet, and a lot of the functionality
need to evolve. This doesn't go very well with being a core module,
and forward-incompat
