-Original Message-
From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:j...@jagunet.com]
Sent: Montag, 28. März 2011 21:08
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: new ProxyPass/ProxyPassReverse feature for 2.4??
Assuming
ProxyPass /foo http://www.example.com/foo
should ProxyPass automatically
Does anyone with a working install want a quick project?
We need to block the Upgrade header field by default. What this
will require is a new configuration command, like
AllowUpgrade None | word ...
where word is any protocol name, like HTTP/2.0, waka, websocket, etc.
The config command
Do you have an internet draft spec for some context here? Is there a
proposal for HTTP/2.0?
I might also argue that a directive is not the right answer here.
Instead, I'd suggest that modules advertise their ability to consume
protocols. If an Upgrade arrives, and a relevant module is found, then
On 3/29/2011 4:16 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
Do you have an internet draft spec for some context here? Is there a
proposal for HTTP/2.0?
I might also argue that a directive is not the right answer here.
Instead, I'd suggest that modules advertise their ability to consume
protocols. If an Upgrade
On Mar 29, 2011 5:35 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 3/29/2011 4:16 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
Do you have an internet draft spec for some context here? Is there a
proposal for HTTP/2.0?
I might also argue that a directive is not the right answer here.
Instead, I'd
In researching our current dependencies, I came up with the following
data which a few of you would probably find interesting (based on only
module-to-module dependencies from httpd trunk built on win32);
MOD_ACCESS_COMPAT.SO
export access_compat_module
MOD_ACTIONS.SO
export
Dear All,
We are planning for an enhancement of our servers.We are looking out if we
write Apache module and use Apache to support the below requirements.
We would like to use Apache as a routing layer that accepts both structured
documents (XML docs) also some other predefined data blocks in
