Dear All,
We are planning for an enhancement of our servers.We are looking out if we
write Apache module and use Apache to support the below requirements.
We would like to use Apache as a routing layer that accepts both structured
documents (XML docs) also some other predefined data blocks in
On Mar 29, 2011, at 11:16 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
Do you have an internet draft spec for some context here? Is there a
proposal for HTTP/2.0?
websockets
I might also argue that a directive is not the right answer here.
Instead, I'd suggest that modules advertise their ability to consume
On 30 Mar 2011, at 10:49 AM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
On Mar 29, 2011, at 11:16 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
Do you have an internet draft spec for some context here? Is there a
proposal for HTTP/2.0?
websockets
In theory, over and above natively supporting websockets, it may be
useful to teach
dev@httpd.apache.org is for discussions related to development of httpd
itself. Your questions below are more appropriate for the Third Party
Module Authors' List. See http://httpd.apache.org/lists.html#modules-dev
A rules execution engine that is able to accept the request, evaluate
a
Hi there,
Mod_log_forensic is saving my day while debugging a crashing
apache. But matching the right request with the crash and its
corefile is difficult.
Ideally the log would show me only the active requests
at the moment the server died. But in my case things are a bit
more difficult. The
On 30 Mar 2011, at 3:23 PM, Christian Folini wrote:
Mod_log_forensic is saving my day while debugging a crashing
apache. But matching the right request with the crash and its
corefile is difficult.
Have you taken a look at Jeff's mod_whatkilledus?
On 30 Mar 2011, at 13:59, Arnab Ganguly wrote:
Dear All,
You've posted this three times now, and it's still no clearer what you want.
Either you're implementing something yourself, or you want to hire someone
to do a job for you. If the latter then please say so! If the former, you
need to
On Mar 30, 2011, at 12:32 PM, Graham Leggett wrote:
On 30 Mar 2011, at 10:49 AM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
On Mar 29, 2011, at 11:16 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
Do you have an internet draft spec for some context here? Is there a
proposal for HTTP/2.0?
websockets
In theory, over and above
On 30 Mar 2011, at 3:53 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
No, websockets is not designed to work with intermediaries.
There is no standard behavior beyond opening the connection,
so connections through proxies should use CONNECT.
Does a websocket client have a way of knowing it should use CONNECT?
Hello,
we are trying to develop a proprietary (i.e. closed-source, binary-shipped)
Apache module and have run into troubles with binary incompatibilities
because of APR_HAS_LARGE_FILES being either 0 or 1. I have only found
http://osdir.com/ml/apache.apr.devel/2003-05/msg00028.html but this does
On Mar 30, 2011, at 4:11 PM, Graham Leggett wrote:
On 30 Mar 2011, at 3:53 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
No, websockets is not designed to work with intermediaries.
There is no standard behavior beyond opening the connection,
so connections through proxies should use CONNECT.
Does a
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 16:25, Ignaz Birnstingl ign...@gmail.com wrote:
we are trying to develop a proprietary (i.e. closed-source, binary-shipped)
Apache module and have run into troubles with binary incompatibilities
because of APR_HAS_LARGE_FILES being either 0 or 1. I have only found
On 30 Mar 2011, at 4:41 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
My guess is that it would if it were told to use a proxy for ws.
Keep in mind that when I say proxy, I do not mean to include
reverse proxy.
A reverse proxy of websockets is just an implementation of
websockets or
a tunnel. I consider
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 11:08, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote:
On 30 Mar 2011, at 4:41 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
My guess is that it would if it were told to use a proxy for ws.
Keep in mind that when I say proxy, I do not mean to include reverse
proxy.
A reverse proxy of websockets
On 30 Mar 2011, at 5:48 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
I think that Roy's point is simply that httpd would be nothing more
than a socket-listener and tunnel. There is very little that it can
bring to the table at that point, so it doesn't make a lot of sense to
lump in websockets capabilities.
In
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 03:32:27PM +0200, Graham Leggett wrote:
Have you taken a look at Jeff's mod_whatkilledus?
http://people.apache.org/~trawick/exception_hook.html
mod_whatkilledus will be one of the next steps in my debugging,
if mod_forensic won't do.
Still I think I could add a small
Hello,
It seems that slotmem_plain is not being found by the consumers which then
causes a configuration error. Attached patch fixes this and makes the error
message a little more friendlier for users by hinting to load slotmem which is
currently not documented as a requirement of these
Hello,
After r1070317 a block of code got moved below the block of Win32 debug code
that starts now at line 447. The code that was above it is now just directly
below but this has caused a crash on Windows for whatever reason (still unknown
to me).
The attached patch moves this block of
18 matches
Mail list logo
