While cleaning up our distribution area, I came across libapreq-1.34
Following the end-of-life of Apache 1.3, do we want to?
[ ] Remove libapreq-1.34 immediately from www.apache.org/dist/ and CPAN
remove it from the download.html page and add a sentence stating that
the 1.3 line of releases is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 27/04/2011 15:31, Issac Goldstand wrote:
[+1] Remove libapreq-1.34 immediately from www.apache.org/dist/ and CPAN
remove it from the download.html page and add a sentence stating that
the 1.3 line of releases is at archives.a.o and backpan
Hola de Cancun!
With APR now voting on new releases, I think it would make
sense for us to start targeting our next beta release: 2.3.12.
My plan is likely towards the end of next week, assuming the
APR vote passes...
Concerns? Feedback?
How does this affect the XML output (sorry, can't test
here)? Personally, I'm sure there are scripts that take
the output from server-status and parse it, and specifically
look for '.'... this will break those.
(PS: Sorry if I'm missing out on the context of this
change...)
On Apr 26, 2011,
Hi,
I am using Apache as a reverse proxy to forward requests to a backend web
server protected by some self-written Apache modules. Now I would like to do a
sub-request to a different location from within an input filter.
What is the easiest way to achieve this? Reading Nick Kew's excellent
On 27 Apr 2011, at 18:07, Micha Lenk wrote:
What else should I keep in mind in this situation?
You may be a little confused. Subrquests and internal redirects
are not the same thing, and serve different purposes. Maybe the
book, which discusses them in consecutive sections in the chapter
on
On 27 Apr 2011, at 7:07 PM, Micha Lenk wrote:
I am using Apache as a reverse proxy to forward requests to a
backend web
server protected by some self-written Apache modules. Now I would
like to do a
sub-request to a different location from within an input filter.
What is the easiest way to
Hi Graham,
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 07:44:05PM +0200, Graham Leggett wrote:
On 27 Apr 2011, at 7:07 PM, Micha Lenk wrote:
I am using Apache as a reverse proxy to forward requests to a backend web
server protected by some self-written Apache modules. Now I would like to
do a sub-request to a
Could someone with commit access take a look at the following patches?
Neither of these are high priority, but I don't want to let them get too
far out of date.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51077
Fixes two issues with how mod_rewrite handles rules with the [P] flag:
-
I'll take a look... thx!
On Apr 27, 2011, at 2:03 PM, Mark Montague wrote:
Could someone with commit access take a look at the following patches?
Neither of these are high priority, but I don't want to let them get too far
out of date.
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
How does this affect the XML output (sorry, can't test
here)? Personally, I'm sure there are scripts that take
the output from server-status and parse it, and specifically
look for '.'... this will break those.
(PS:
On Wednesday 27 April 2011, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com
wrote:
How does this affect the XML output (sorry, can't test
here)? Personally, I'm sure there are scripts that take
the output from server-status and parse it, and
12 matches
Mail list logo
