On 10/27/2011 3:15 PM, s...@apache.org wrote:
Use apr_pregsub_ex() and maxlen = 0 for unlimited in mod_substitute.
Uhm... wha?
Not acceptable. Choose a bound. unlimited is not acceptable.
Yes, that is a veto.
On 10/27/2011 12:31 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Still hoping to get these out, esp getting the ball rolling for
an actual 2.4.0 GA by ApacheCon…
There is a hold up due to an issue which may need to be
fixed/addressed and that's the reason for the delay...
I'm happy to help by rolling 2.0.65,
As previously discussed on the dev list, I've recently relicensed
mod_proxy_html and mod_xml2enc and donated them to Apache.
Details in my blog piece at
http://bahumbug.wordpress.com/2011/10/28/modules-move-home/
Of possible interest to developers, packagers, and end-users who build
from source
On 10/28/2011 4:31 AM, Nick Kew wrote:
As previously discussed on the dev list, I've recently relicensed
mod_proxy_html and mod_xml2enc and donated them to Apache.
Details in my blog piece at
http://bahumbug.wordpress.com/2011/10/28/modules-move-home/
Of possible interest to developers,
On Oct 28, 2011, at 3:10 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 10/27/2011 12:31 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Still hoping to get these out, esp getting the ball rolling for
an actual 2.4.0 GA by ApacheCon…
There is a hold up due to an issue which may need to be
fixed/addressed and that's the
On Oct 27, 2011, at 4:21 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
That's correct, it would crash if len == APR_SIZE_MAX. But my point
was that it would also crash for len == APR_SIZE_MAX-1000, because by
definition, the machine cannot have that much free mem and apr_pcalloc
would call abort(). So in
Is the Win32DisableAcceptEx issue solved ?
- Original Message -
From: Jim Jagielski j...@apache.org
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2011 2:35 PM
Subject: Re: 2.0.65 and 2.3.15-dev
On Oct 28, 2011, at 3:10 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 10/27/2011 12:31 PM,
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Steffen i...@apachelounge.com wrote:
Is the Win32DisableAcceptEx issue solved ?
A fix for the AcceptFilter+windows+vhost thing was checked in a few weeks ago
Cannot find it in Trunk.
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
From: Eric Covener
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2011 3:13 PM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: 2.0.65 and 2.3.15-dev
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Steffen i...@apachelounge.com wrote:
Is the Win32DisableAcceptEx issue
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Steffen i...@apachelounge.com wrote:
Cannot find it in Trunk.
IIUC This is the fix for ip-based vhosts with AcceptFilter none on
windows in trunk:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=1181140
Great,
time to make 2.3.15 available to test.
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
From: Eric Covener
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2011 4:38 PM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: 2.0.65 and 2.3.15-dev
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Steffen i...@apachelounge.com wrote:
Cannot
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 10:42 AM, Steffen i...@apachelounge.com wrote:
Great,
time to make 2.3.15 available to test.
It would be most useful to be tested ahead of being part of an
attempted release.
On 10/28/2011 7:51 AM, Steffen wrote:
Is the Win32DisableAcceptEx issue solved ?
It wouldn't matter.
The delta between 2.3.x-beta and 2.4.0 is not a code freeze...
it is API freeze, any public interfaces must be baked. We won't be
changing ap_doit() to add or change an argument until 2.6.0,
On 10/28/2011 8:00 AM, Eric Covener wrote:
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 10:42 AM, Steffeni...@apachelounge.com wrote:
Great,
time to make 2.3.15 available to test.
It would be most useful to be tested ahead of being part of an
attempted release.
For the pre-mentioned AcceptFilter+windows+vhost
Hi, folks;
I wanted draw attention to the 2.2 STATUS file where the
SSLProxyMachineCertificateChainFile directive awaits any additional
votes. I know there was a lot of discussion between Kaspar and myself
getting things in place, but I hope that didn't turn folks off to the patch.
For
On 10/28/2011 6:07 PM, Gregg L. Smith wrote:
On 10/28/2011 8:00 AM, Eric Covener wrote:
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 10:42 AM, Steffeni...@apachelounge.com wrote:
Great,
time to make 2.3.15 available to test.
It would be most useful to be tested ahead of being part of an
attempted release.
For
16 matches
Mail list logo
