Hello,
I would like to make a suggestion to apache web server developer and to
open a discussion related with the way apache is working currently when a
directory where apache must create logs files does not exists.
Currently if I create a virtual host and set there Error/Custom Log entries
to
On 21.12.2011 09:04, Ali Nebi wrote:
Hello,
I would like to make a suggestion to apache web server developer and to open
a discussion related with the way
apache is working currently when a directory where apache must create logs
files does not exists.
and at least fix that apachectl
On 13 Dec 2011, at 6:22 PM, Graham Leggett wrote:
- mod_policy: HTTP protocol police
Based on the support expressed, and the expressed preference that the module be
part of httpd, I have written appropriate documentation for the module, as well
as documentation targeted at developers affected
On 12/21/2011 4:35 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
On 13 Dec 2011, at 6:22 PM, Graham Leggett wrote:
- mod_policy: HTTP protocol police
Based on the support expressed, and the expressed preference that the module
be part of httpd, I have written appropriate documentation for the module, as
minf...@apache.org wrote:
Author: minfrin
Date: Wed Dec 21 10:42:34 2011
New Revision: 1221668
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1221668view=rev
Log:
mod_policy: Add a new testing module to help server administrators
enforce a configurable level of protocol compliance on their
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 03:25:09AM -0600, William Rowe wrote:
On 11/18/2011 4:38 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
After several prods, it seems the security@ and hackathon participants
can't be drawn out of their shells on to dev@. So I'll simply call for
a majority vote on the following
On 21 Dec 2011, at 2:57 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
+apr_table_addn(r-headers_out, Warning, apr_psprintf(r-pool,
+299 %s \%s\, ap_get_server_name(r), message));
What is this 299 about?
It's described in RFC2616:
Graham Leggett wrote:
On 21 Dec 2011, at 2:57 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
+apr_table_addn(r-headers_out, Warning, apr_psprintf(r-pool,
+299 %s \%s\, ap_get_server_name(r), message));
What is this 299 about?
It's described in RFC2616:
On 21 Dec 2011, at 5:48 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Ahh. Thanks for the pointer. Missed that it got set as a Warning header. I
thought
that this string got logged :-). Hence my confusion.
Anyway shouldn't we #define 299 to a selfspeaking name like other HTTP codes
such that
this is
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 4:26 AM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
We should come to a conclusion on this.
How about this for 2.2.x ?
--- server/util.c (revision 1179624)
+++ server/util.c (working copy)
@@ -82,6 +82,8 @@
#define IS_SLASH(s) (s == '/')
#endif
+/*
Am 21.12.2011 20:08, schrieb Greg Ames:
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 4:26 AM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
We should come to a conclusion on this.
How about this for 2.2.x ?
--- server/util.c (revision 1179624)
+++ server/util.c (working copy)
@@ -82,6 +82,8 @@
Am 21.12.2011 23:28, schrieb Guenter Knauf:
Am 21.12.2011 20:08, schrieb Greg Ames:
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 4:26 AM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
We should come to a conclusion on this.
How about this for 2.2.x ?
--- server/util.c (revision 1179624)
+++ server/util.c
Am 21.12.2011 20:08, schrieb Greg Ames:
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 4:26 AM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
We should come to a conclusion on this.
How about this for 2.2.x ?
--- server/util.c (revision 1179624)
+++ server/util.c (working copy)
@@ -82,6 +82,8 @@
13 matches
Mail list logo
