Re: [VOTE] Release 2.0.65 [the final frontier]

2013-06-30 Thread Rainer Jung
On 28.06.2013 23:28, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > Candidates are in http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ > > +/-1 > [+1] Release 2.0.65 as the final 2.0 series package +1 for release and thanks for RM. Tested on Solaris 8+10 Sparc, SuSE Linux Enterprise 10 32Bit, SLES 10+11 64 Bit, RedHat Ente

Re: [VOTE] Release 2.0.65 [the final frontier]

2013-06-30 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 5:28 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > Candidates are in http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ > > +/-1 > [ ] Release 2.0.65 as the final 2.0 series package > > TIA! > [+1] Release 2.0.65 as the final 2.0 series package Tested 64-bit builds on FreeBSD 9 Compares favorab

Re: stop copying r->content_type to r->handler?

2013-06-30 Thread Eric Covener
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Joseph Schaefer wrote: > The directory handling still relies on this. Other *_MAGIC_TYPES do too, but I'm guessing they could be boiled down to just r->handler.

Re: stop copying r->content_type to r->handler?

2013-06-30 Thread Joseph Schaefer
The directory handling still relies on this. Sent from my iPhone On Jun 30, 2013, at 3:47 PM, Eric Covener wrote: > All releases still have what I guess is an old pre-SetHandler > mechanism to allow content type -> handler mappings. If no r->handler > has been set, but a content-type has, the c

stop copying r->content_type to r->handler?

2013-06-30 Thread Eric Covener
All releases still have what I guess is an old pre-SetHandler mechanism to allow content type -> handler mappings. If no r->handler has been set, but a content-type has, the content-type is copied to r->handler. Is there a use case for this? It makes it hard for handlers to check if someone else h

Re: [VOTE] Release 2.2.25

2013-06-30 Thread Gregg Smith
On 6/28/2013 2:29 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: +/-1 [+1] Release 2.2.25 (apr 1.4.8, apr-util 1.5.2) VC9 x64 Server 2003 R2 x64 VC9 x86 Vista x86

Re: [VOTE] Release 2.0.65 [the final frontier]

2013-06-30 Thread Eric Covener
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 5:28 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > Candidates are in http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ > +1, tested on AIX 5.3 / xlc / PPC32 and AIX 7.1 / xlc / PPC64 AIX 5.3: Only failures in recently updated include.t timezone stuff AIX 7.1: 100% success -- Eric Covener cove...@gma

Re: [VOTE] Release 2.2.25

2013-06-30 Thread Guenter Knauf
On 28.06.2013 23:29, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: Candidates are in http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ +/-1 [ ] Release 2.2.25 (apr 1.4.8, apr-util 1.5.2) +1 on NetWare.

Re: [VOTE] Release 2.0.65 [the final frontier]

2013-06-30 Thread Guenter Knauf
On 28.06.2013 23:28, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: Candidates are in http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ +/-1 [ ] Release 2.0.65 as the final 2.0 series package TIA! it seems a bit odd to me that we now roll the 2.0.65 final without having APR/APU picking up latest fixes [1][2], making thi