Hi,
Here is a quick background on what I am trying to do(basically adding
support for websockets - in a slightly customised manner as needed for
my app):
- Handle the initial handshake inside a cb function registered as a
handler hook(from here, I compute checksums required and return the
Given something like this
LocationMatch ^/(foo|bar)
ProxyPass balancer://abc123/
ProxyPassReverse balancer://abc123/
...
LocationMatch
it is obvious the regexp ^/(foo|bar) is used to determine the correct
location container to use for a given request. But after this, what is it's
value for
We would like to propose the attached patch.
It is inspired by the several iterations of changing the respective checks.
use macros for the code that checks for command and virtual host sameness
That code consists of several lines which were duplicated in several
places. Now the
On 09/18/2013 02:19 PM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Jan Kaluža jkal...@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/22/2013 08:02 AM, Jan Kaluza wrote:
- Original Message -
Hello Jan,
Is there any reason we shouldn't do this in trunk?
I don't see any reason. This patch was
On Sep 25, 2013, at 8:07 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wmr...@gmail.com wrote:
Before we incorporate it... can we have some sense of the impact of the
optimization? So far we don't have much data to go on.
From the orig post: My benchmarks show decreased latency and a performance
boost of ~5%
Hi,
It seems some files are missing in trunk from Makefile.win
+++
!ELSEIF EXIST(httpd.mak) !defined(USEDSW)
+++
Is that correct or do I miss something?
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 8:47 AM, jean-frederic clere jfcl...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
It seems some files are missing in trunk from Makefile.win
+++
!ELSEIF EXIST(httpd.mak) !defined(USEDSW)
+++
Is that correct or do I miss something?
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
Use cmake :)
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 8:47 AM, jean-frederic clere jfcl...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
It seems some files are missing in trunk from Makefile.win
+++
!ELSEIF EXIST(httpd.mak) !defined(USEDSW)
+++
Is that correct or do I
On 09/26/2013 03:14 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com
mailto:traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 8:47 AM, jean-frederic clere
jfcl...@gmail.com mailto:jfcl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
It seems some files
On Thu, 26 Sep 2013 08:25:46 -0400
Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
On Sep 25, 2013, at 8:07 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wmr...@gmail.com
wrote:
Before we incorporate it... can we have some sense of the impact of
the optimization? So far we don't have much data to go on.
From the
On Sep 26, 2013, at 10:20 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On Thu, 26 Sep 2013 08:25:46 -0400
Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
On Sep 25, 2013, at 8:07 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wmr...@gmail.com
wrote:
Before we incorporate it... can we have some sense of the
On 09/26/2013 02:49 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 8:47 AM, jean-frederic clere jfcl...@gmail.com
mailto:jfcl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
It seems some files are missing in trunk from Makefile.win
+++
!ELSEIF EXIST(httpd.mak) !defined(USEDSW)
+++
Is that
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 11:45 AM, jean-frederic clere jfcl...@gmail.comwrote:
On 09/26/2013 02:49 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 8:47 AM, jean-frederic clere jfcl...@gmail.com
mailto:jfcl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
It seems some files are missing in trunk from
+1 with many thanks,
Chris.
--
GPG Key ID: 088335A9
GPG Key Fingerprint: 86CD 3297 7493 75BC F820 6715 F54F E648 0883 35A9
On Tue, 24 Sep 2013 08:06:59 +0200
Jan Kaluža jkal...@redhat.com wrote:
On 09/23/2013 09:30 PM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
On 23 September 2013 23:13, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Ivan Zhakov i...@visualsvn.com
wrote:
On 23 September 2013 22:35, Jeff
You realize : is a problematic overload for Netware (and in theory for Win32
unless you dodge the X: single-char drive letter bullet)?
What about a [provider]path syntax instead? Any other good ideas? A
notoriously bad idea was the (size) overload of the SSLSessionCache directive.
How
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 10:39 PM, Kaspar Brand httpd-dev.2...@velox.ch wrote:
On 25.09.2013 04:13, Trevor Perrin wrote:
The feature is checked in to the 1.0.2 branch [1], so we'd like to
expose it through Apache.
The patch is pretty simple. I suppose more tests or docs might be
needed (?),
17 matches
Mail list logo