+1.
On Nov 12, 2013, at 4:44 PM, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote:
On 12 Nov 2013, at 11:41 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net
wrote:
Trying to apply
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/log-message-tags/next-number?r1=1527925r2=1527924pathrev=1527925
...
+1
On Nov 12, 2013, at 10:10 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On Wed, 13 Nov 2013 00:07:08 +0200
Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote:
On 13 Nov 2013, at 12:00 AM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
Follow-up question; is reuse recommended? In this small
+1
Regards
Rüdiger
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jim Jagielski
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 13. November 2013 13:01
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Question on APLOGNO assignment, 2.4 vs trunk
+1.
On Nov 12, 2013, at 4:44 PM, Graham Leggett wrote:
On 12 Nov 2013, at 11:41
It doesn't look like one to me... :/
On Nov 12, 2013, at 10:08 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
It seems this changes all sorts of assumptions, I would consider
r1482522 an ABI/API altering change.
On 13 Nov 2013, at 2:04 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
It doesn't look like one to me... :/
One thing it does is make the return codes more targeted. Where previously any
kind of failure would have returned 500 Internal Server Error[1] now we might
return more specific codes based
On Nov 13, 2013, at 7:10 AM, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote:
On 13 Nov 2013, at 2:04 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
It doesn't look like one to me... :/
One thing it does is make the return codes more targeted. Where previously
any kind of failure would have returned
This will happen noon eastern.
On Nov 12, 2013, at 4:22 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
I'll build w/ 2.67 and 1.5.26 for consistency.
+1... I wasn't sure the best entry to add :)
On Nov 13, 2013, at 8:31 AM, cove...@apache.org wrote:
Author: covener
Date: Wed Nov 13 13:31:22 2013
New Revision: 1541516
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1541516
Log:
owed a CHANGES entry on r1538490 backport, review appreciated.
Modified:
On 23.10.2013 16:09, Kaspar Brand wrote:
On 21.10.2013 06:09, Trevor Perrin wrote:
I looked at your patch. Besides lack of passphrase-handling, it
breaks compatibility with existing config files (which assume
certs/keys are matched by type, not order).
I don't think that random order of
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 8:25 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.netwrote:
Looking at the (f-r-proxyreq == PROXYREQ_RESPONSE) code path,
the comments note;
* http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-23
* Section 3.3.3.3: If a Transfer-Encoding header field is
*
On 13/11/2013 14:06, Kaspar Brand wrote:
Taking a step back, however, I wonder what problem we're really solving
with the support for encrypted private keys. SSLPassPhraseDialog and its
three incarnations (builtin, pipe and exec) have been in mod_ssl ever
since 2.0, sure, but what do they
On Nov 13, 2013 8:22 AM, Yann Ylavic ylavic@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 8:25 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net
wrote:
Looking at the (f-r-proxyreq == PROXYREQ_RESPONSE) code path,
the comments note;
* http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-23
Now that APR 1.5 is soon-to-be released, we are good for
a release of 2.4.7.
I propose a TR next week (I'll RM) and would request
that people look thru STATUS for some remaining backports.
On Wed, 13 Nov 2013 08:15:48 -0500
Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
On Nov 13, 2013, at 7:10 AM, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote:
On 13 Nov 2013, at 2:04 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
It doesn't look like one to me... :/
One thing it does is make the return
The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.2.26 can be found
at the usual place:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.2.26 GA.
[ ] +1: Good to go
[ ] +0: meh
[ ] -1: Danger Will Robinson. And why.
Vote will last the normal 72
On Nov 13, 2013, at 12:03 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
releasecheck: libtool version 2.4.2 (ok)
That was an incorrect c/p: it's really:
releasecheck: libtool version 1.5.26 (ok)
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 5:16 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wmr...@gmail.comwrote:
On Nov 13, 2013 8:22 AM, Yann Ylavic ylavic@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 8:25 AM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
Looking at the (f-r-proxyreq == PROXYREQ_RESPONSE) code path,
On 11/13/13 9:03 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.2.26 can be found
at the usual place:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.2.26 GA.
[ ] +1: Good to go
[ ] +0: meh
[ ] -1: Danger Will
On Wed, 13 Nov 2013 22:19:37 +0100
Yann Ylavic ylavic@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 5:16 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wmr...@gmail.comwrote:
On Nov 13, 2013 8:22 AM, Yann Ylavic ylavic@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 8:25 AM, William A. Rowe Jr.
On Nov 13, 2013, at 4:50 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
I'll accept the silence as fact that this was not considered and will
go ahead and veto the backports for the time being
That is not the case. The silence is that you are mentioning
something which isn't applicable.
+1: Fedora 16 and 18, 64bit
OSX 10.9, Xcode 5.0.2
CentOS 6.4, 64bit
No regressions and perl framework passes.
On Nov 13, 2013, at 12:03 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.2.26 can be found
at the usual place:
On Nov 13, 2013, at 2:25 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
Here we've unset C-L and T-E. but it makes no sense to wait if the
origin server has no immediate plan to close the connection.
I cannot grok the above. The RFC itself does not make
the differentiation between
On Wed, 13 Nov 2013 17:14:15 -0500
Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
On Nov 13, 2013, at 2:25 AM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
Here we've unset C-L and T-E. but it makes no sense to wait if the
origin server has no immediate plan to close the connection.
I
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 12:05 AM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.netwrote:
On Wed, 13 Nov 2013 17:14:15 -0500
Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
On Nov 13, 2013, at 2:25 AM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
Here we've unset C-L and T-E. but it makes no sense
On 13 Nov 2013, at 7:03 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.2.26 can be found
at the usual place:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.2.26 GA.
[ ] +1: Good to go
+1 for
On 11/13/2013 10:39 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Now that APR 1.5 is soon-to-be released, we are good for
a release of 2.4.7.
I propose a TR next week (I'll RM) and would request
that people look thru STATUS for some remaining backports.
Are you hoping to push for UDS in 2.4.7? Seems like a
On 11/13/2013 11:03 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
[X] +1: Good to go
[ ] +0: meh
[ ] -1: Danger Will Robinson. And why.
Verified on Debian 7.0 wheezy w/ openssl 0.9.8 and php 5.3 as
accompaniments
--
Daniel Ruggeri
On 13.11.2013 15:28, Dr Stephen Henson wrote:
I can vaguely recall that some of that code is designed to avoid the need to
enter the private key passphrase more than once by decrypting private keys
once
and storing the unencrypted forms in serialised form.
True, it allows to SIGHUP/SIGUSR1
28 matches
Mail list logo
