On 08/14/2014 04:22 PM, Jan Kaluža wrote:
Hi,
I'm resurrecting this old thread, because I hesitate to do changes in
signal handling without any ack of someone else.
Committed in r1618555.
Jan Kaluza
This bug is more problematic in the context of docker [1] where people
tend to run httpd
jkal...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jkaluza
Date: Mon Aug 18 07:43:43 2014
New Revision: 1618555
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1618555
Log:
prefork: Ignore SIGINT in child. This fixes race-condition in signals handling
when httpd is runnning on foreground and user hits ctrl+c. In this case,
jkal...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jkaluza
Date: Mon Aug 18 10:48:41 2014
New Revision: 1618579
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1618579
Log:
mod_systemd: Add IdleShutdown - number of seconds in idle-state after which
httpd is shutdown. This is useful in a combination with socket activation.
On 08/18/2014 02:23 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
jkal...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jkaluza
Date: Mon Aug 18 10:48:41 2014
New Revision: 1618579
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1618579
Log:
mod_systemd: Add IdleShutdown - number of seconds in idle-state after which
httpd is shutdown. This is useful
On 08/18/2014 02:20 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
jkal...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jkaluza
Date: Mon Aug 18 07:43:43 2014
New Revision: 1618555
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1618555
Log:
prefork: Ignore SIGINT in child. This fixes race-condition in signals handling
when httpd is runnning on
Hi,
only short notes from me. I'd appreciate such a directive very much. I
think, allowing it in .htaccess won't hurt. I can't come up with a use
case, where the person behind the script doesn't have access to the
credentials anyway.
As for the passing right now, you don't need the whole
The problem is sys admins who don't know what they are doing as far as
administering Apache.
I used to work in a corporate environment where they allowed everyone a
~username directory for placing stuff. As they wanted to allow people to
setup certain type of scripts in their directory, they
On 16 Aug 2014, at 10:16 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
This core directive would be used to modify the processing of
ap_add_common_vars() to pass through Authorization or Proxy-Authorization as
HTTP_foo. (Nothing else is currently blocked, so any other header name
wouldn't
