Re: svn commit: r1618555 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/server/mpm/prefork/prefork.c

2014-08-21 Thread Jan Kaluža
On 08/18/2014 04:31 PM, Jan Kaluža wrote: On 08/18/2014 02:20 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: jkal...@apache.org wrote: Author: jkaluza Date: Mon Aug 18 07:43:43 2014 New Revision: 1618555 URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1618555 Log: prefork: Ignore SIGINT in child. This fixes race-condition in

Re: Apache 2.2.28 release timing.

2014-08-21 Thread Jim Jagielski
I offered to RM but OtherBill said he'd do it; plus, last time I did, I used more up-to-date versions of autoconf, et.al. and OtherBill complained that for the 2.2 built, we should continue to use the much older versions... FWIW, I still can't recall which old version numbers we should be using

Re: Apache 2.2.28 release timing.

2014-08-21 Thread Ruediger Pluem
Jim Jagielski wrote: I offered to RM but OtherBill said he'd do it; plus, last time I did, I used more up-to-date versions of autoconf, et.al. and OtherBill complained that for the 2.2 built, we should continue to use the much older versions... FWIW, I still can't recall which old version

Re: [RFC] CGIPassHeader Authorization|Proxy-Authorization|...

2014-08-21 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 9:09 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 9:04 AM, Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 8:59 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote: I'm +0.75 or so for having to explicitly enable the use of CGIPassHeader in

Re: svn commit: r1615289 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: CHANGES modules/proxy/mod_proxy_http.c

2014-08-21 Thread Yann Ylavic
On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 10:24 AM, rj...@apache.org wrote: Author: rjung Date: Sat Aug 2 08:24:35 2014 New Revision: 1615289 URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1615289 Log: PR53420: Proxy responses with error status and ProxyErrorOverride On hang until proxy timeout. Regression from 2.2. It was

Re: svn commit: r1619383 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/filters/mod_deflate.c

2014-08-21 Thread Yann Ylavic
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 3:11 PM, cove...@apache.org wrote: Author: covener Date: Thu Aug 21 13:11:15 2014 New Revision: 1619383 URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1619383 Log: A misplaced check for inflation limits prevented limiting relatively small inputs. PR56872 Submitted By: Edward Lu

Re: svn commit: r1619383 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/filters/mod_deflate.c

2014-08-21 Thread Yann Ylavic
The (missing) patch... On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 4:34 PM, Yann Ylavic ylavic@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 3:11 PM, cove...@apache.org wrote: Author: covener Date: Thu Aug 21 13:11:15 2014 New Revision: 1619383 URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1619383 Log: A misplaced check for

AW: svn commit: r1619383 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/filters/mod_deflate.c

2014-08-21 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
Should be fine. Regards Rüdiger -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Yann Ylavic [mailto:ylavic@gmail.com] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 21. August 2014 16:37 An: httpd Betreff: Re: svn commit: r1619383 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/filters/mod_deflate.c The (missing) patch... On Thu,

Re: svn commit: r1619383 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/filters/mod_deflate.c

2014-08-21 Thread Eric Covener
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 10:34 AM, Yann Ylavic ylavic@gmail.com wrote: Should I apply it? yes, I think I see now that the removal is wrong and the other stuff is more readable. But I am a bit confused as to why we check only the ratio sometimes (in the blocks when moving the full zlib buffer

Re: svn commit: r1619383 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/filters/mod_deflate.c

2014-08-21 Thread Eric Covener
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 11:25 AM, Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 10:34 AM, Yann Ylavic ylavic@gmail.com wrote: Should I apply it? yes, I think I see now that the removal is wrong and the other stuff is more readable. But I am a bit confused as to why we

Re: svn commit: r1619383 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/filters/mod_deflate.c

2014-08-21 Thread Yann Ylavic
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 11:25 AM, Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 10:34 AM, Yann Ylavic ylavic@gmail.com wrote: Should I apply it? yes, I think I see now that the removal is wrong and the

Re: Apache 2.2.28 release timing.

2014-08-21 Thread Jim Jagielski
I have a CentOS 5 system that may have those older versions... CentOS 6 uses libtool 2.2.6b... Let me check and, if so, I can RM. Thx! On Aug 21, 2014, at 7:59 AM, Ruediger Pluem rpl...@apache.org wrote: Jim Jagielski wrote: I offered to RM but OtherBill said he'd do it; plus, last time

Re: Apache 2.2.28 release timing.

2014-08-21 Thread Jim Jagielski
OK... created a CentOS5 system w/ libtool 1.5.26 and autoconf 2.69, so I can RM 2.2.x! On Aug 21, 2014, at 12:26 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote: I have a CentOS 5 system that may have those older versions... CentOS 6 uses libtool 2.2.6b... Let me check and, if so, I can RM.

Re: Apache 2.2.28 release timing.

2014-08-21 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On Thu, 21 Aug 2014 13:59:52 +0200 Ruediger Pluem rpl...@apache.org wrote: Jim Jagielski wrote: I offered to RM but OtherBill said he'd do it; plus, last time I did, I used more up-to-date versions of autoconf, et.al. and OtherBill complained that for the 2.2 built, we should

Re: ./configure differences between 2.2.x and 2.4.x

2014-08-21 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On Fri, 8 Aug 2014 10:55:17 +0200 Michael Felt mamf...@gmail.com wrote: *Please excuse my laziness* - because I am sure there is a way to get all modules activated in both 2.2.X and 2.4.X - only that they are slightly different - and I am sure you have documented it somewhere (and even

Re: svn commit: r1619446 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS

2014-08-21 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 11:35 AM, mru...@apache.org wrote: Author: mrumph Date: Thu Aug 21 15:35:43 2014 New Revision: 1619446 URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1619446 Log: Comment on possible trailers CVE delay. Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS Modified:

Re: Apache 2.2.28 release timing.

2014-08-21 Thread Ben Reser
On 8/21/14 6:26 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: That about sums it up. Sorry, I am still drowning in my late father's affairs for another 3-4 weeks, but will make time to do this in 2 hours from now, sum up votes and move files Sun a.m. for a Mon a.m. release. That saves anyone else from