+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
On 2014-08-23 12:36, Graham Leggett wrote:
On 23 Aug 2014, at 3:40 PM, Mark Montague m...@catseye.org wrote:
[root@sky ~]# httpd -t
AH00526: Syntax error on line 148 of /etc/httpd/conf/dev.catseye.org.conf:
CacheEnable cannot occur within If section
[root@sky ~]#
The solution here is to lift
In the past I have used buildconf messages as a reminder for where I should
be looking for apr and apr-util
Since I read in the VOTE thread a bit about the apr version being updated,
I would like to mention that buildconf still talks about 1.4.X versions.
package builds fine using the build/aix scripts, except these ignore, if
possible, the srcapr that was included in the tarball.
Question: is the .gdbinit in tarball root part of the distro now?
Apeche::Test returned these errors
Test Summary Report
---
t/apache/server_name_port.t
built on a second server, but at AIX 5.3 TL12 (5300-12-05-1140), previous
report was on AIX 5.3 TL7 (5300-07-10-0943) - so the differences (more
tests passed) may be related to that. However, on the old AIX 5.3 TL7 to
2.4.9 tests (nearly) all pass.
BOTH are reporting some failed CVE tests!
With
Michael, can you please compare 2.2.27 to 2.2.29? 2.2 in testing doesn't
resemble 2.4. That said, we are simply concerned about any potential
regressions in the legacy branch.
Thanks for the feedback!
Michael Felt mamf...@gmail.com wrote:
built on a second server, but at AIX 5.3 TL12
Yes, I will compare with the 2.2.27 branch for regressions.
I just completed a comparison of 2.2.x and 2.4.x.
Maybe you can help me with the correct configure settings to really get all
modules - without resorting to maintainer mode.
Just wanted to compare both 2.2.x and 2.4.x (say
In short, no regression I spot in my builds (in this case, both on AIX 5.3
TL7, no_proxy)
root@x093:[/data/prj/apache/httpd/test]diff -u *results
--- 2.2.27.results 2014-08-24 21:29:52 +
+++ 2.2.29.results 2014-08-24 21:29:18 +
@@ -33,6 +33,6 @@
Failed tests: 1-73
