Hi,
latest comment in PR 53435 shows that memory leak in mod_ssl which
happens during graceful restarts can be caused by r101624. Since this
commit is 11 years old, I wanted to ask people here, if following is
still true with current OpenSSL:
@@ -255,7 +255,11 @@ static apr_status_t
On 9/11/14 1:26 AM, Martynas Bendorius wrote:
For someone who is going to review the patch, I am adding more
information of why is the patch needed. Patch includes only a few minor
changes to it, that would help shared web hosting to adopt FastCGI for
some critical parts like global
is this pattern in event safe?
apr_pool_clear(cs-p);
ap_push_pool(worker_queue_info, cs-p);
cs itself is allocated from cs-p (ptrans)
Must cs-p be copied to the stack since MaxMemFree could return these bytes?
(I have been chasing a rare crash in this neighborhood, but this
On 11/11/2014 13:32, Jan Kaluža wrote:
Hi,
latest comment in PR 53435 shows that memory leak in mod_ssl which happens
during graceful restarts can be caused by r101624. Since this commit is 11
years
old, I wanted to ask people here, if following is still true with current
OpenSSL:
@@
On 09.11.2014 14:30, Graham Leggett wrote:
On 06 Nov 2014, at 8:05 AM, Kaspar Brand httpd-dev.2...@velox.ch wrote:
Is there another way to do this?
Manually performing what certificateExactMatch is specifying, I would
say - i.e., use the (SSL_CLIENT_M_SERIAL,SSL_CLIENT_I_DN) tuple as a
On 12.11.2014 03:28, Dr Stephen Henson wrote:
I just checked the sources and this was fixed in OpenSSL 0.9.7m just over 7
years ago...
For 0.9.8, it was fixed with 0.9.8e:
https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=900f7a87760d1053127976480efcd71371787d6e
I.e., given that
On 11/12/2014 07:16 AM, Kaspar Brand wrote:
On 12.11.2014 03:28, Dr Stephen Henson wrote:
I just checked the sources and this was fixed in OpenSSL 0.9.7m just over 7
years ago...
For 0.9.8, it was fixed with 0.9.8e:
