On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 12:50 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
[ ] +1: Good to go
+1 AIX/xlc/PPC64 100% pass
On my box:
t/protocol/nntp-like.t .. skipped: deferred accept()
prohibits testing with 2.1
Any (new) differ accept in Darwin?
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
Also on trunk...
On Jun 19, 2015, at 8:07 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
I do a full t/TEST clean
On Jun 19, 2015, at 8:56 AM, Ruediger Pluem rpl...@apache.org wrote:
Maybe the test certs in your test suite need regeneration, because they are
expired?
Regards
Rüdiger
On 06/19/2015 02:12 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Also on trunk...
On Jun 19, 2015, at
Which, I see, does NOT rm and regen the certs... The certs themselves
are only good for 365 days.
This seems wrong :)
Anyway, after trashing the certs, test passes OK. Sorry for the
false alarm.
On Jun 19, 2015, at 8:59 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
I do a full t/TEST clean
I have a proprietary module that uses a proprietary library. The
library needs an EOR cleanup that must run on the same thread as the
handler. During async write completion it will often happen on the
wrong thread.
There's already a path for forcing a blocking write of a particular
bucket, so it
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 9:54 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
Can ap_hook_{suspend_resume}_connection() allow you to remove that
requirement?
I don't think so -- at least not easily. It's effectively fopen() and
close() for a special kind of file (that's being served)
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 10:02 AM, Yann Ylavic ylavic@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe make MAX_REQUESTS_IN_PIPELINE configurable and use 1 in your case?
that's interesting, will check it out.
On 06/19/2015 09:51 AM, Eric Covener wrote:
I have a proprietary module that uses a proprietary library. The
library needs an EOR cleanup that must run on the same thread as the
handler. During async write completion it will often happen on the
wrong thread.
Can
On 06/19/2015 09:54 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On 06/19/2015 09:51 AM, Eric Covener wrote:
I have a proprietary module that uses a proprietary library. The
library needs an EOR cleanup that must run on the same thread as the
handler. During async write completion it will often happen on the
wrong
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for any ideas.
Maybe make MAX_REQUESTS_IN_PIPELINE configurable and use 1 in your case?
Maybe the test certs in your test suite need regeneration, because they are
expired?
Regards
Rüdiger
On 06/19/2015 02:12 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Also on trunk...
On Jun 19, 2015, at 8:07 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
This is on Darwin... will test on others.
Just a reminder...
I plan on doing so by 12:30pm, Eastern.
On Jun 18, 2015, at 1:08 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
Subj sez it all.
This is on Darwin... will test on others.
t/protocol/nntp-like.t ..
1..10
# Running under perl version 5.020002 for darwin
# Current time local: Fri Jun 19 08:04:27 2015
# Current time GMT: Fri Jun 19 12:04:27 2015
# Using Test.pm version 1.26
# Using Apache/Test.pm version 1.40
testing
Also on trunk...
On Jun 19, 2015, at 8:07 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
This is on Darwin... will test on others.
t/protocol/nntp-like.t ..
1..10
# Running under perl version 5.020002 for darwin
# Current time local: Fri Jun 19 08:04:27 2015
# Current time GMT: Fri Jun 19
On 06/18/2015 12:22 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 11:49 AM, Jan Pazdziora jpazdzi...@redhat.com wrote:
I'd appreciate any comments about suitability of such change, as well
as the implementation. Specifically, I'm not sure if people will
prefer the generic and currently
Someone to (easy) vote for the warning issue fixed in r1684057?
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 1:52 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
Just a reminder...
I plan on doing so by 12:30pm, Eastern.
On Jun 18, 2015, at 1:08 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
Subj sez it all.
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 11:56 AM, Yann Ylavic ylavic@gmail.com wrote:
Instead of SSL_CLIENT_OID_, we could also have something like
SSL_CLIENT__oid|shortname|fullname__n since the underlying mod_ssl
code handles both (IIRC).
I don't know if SAN_otherName/UPN have a short/long name though,
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Jan Kaluža jkal...@redhat.com wrote:
On 06/18/2015 12:22 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 11:49 AM, Jan Pazdziora jpazdzi...@redhat.com
wrote:
I'd appreciate any comments about suitability of such change, as well
as the implementation.
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 12:22:21PM +0200, Yann Ylavic wrote:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 11:49 AM, Jan Pazdziora jpazdzi...@redhat.com wrote:
I'd appreciate any comments about suitability of such change, as well
as the implementation. Specifically, I'm not sure if people will
prefer the
The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.15 can be found
at the usual place:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.15 GA.
[ ] +1: Good to go
[ ] +0: meh
[ ] -1: Danger Will Robinson. And why.
Vote will last the normal 72
On Jun 18, 2015 1:45 PM, William A Rowe Jr wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On Jun 11, 2015 8:22 AM, Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 9:08 AM William A Rowe Jr wr...@rowe-clan.net
wrote:
But withholding a security fix for legacy server users? Sounds like a
way to
21 matches
Mail list logo
