Re: httpd Protocols proposal

2015-07-22 Thread Eric Covener
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Stefan Eissing stefan.eiss...@greenbytes.de wrote: Hmm, that would mean first come, first negotiated? There are RUN_FIRST (e.g. handler and translate_name) and RUN_ALL (e.g. fixups and pre_connection) flavors of the hook functions.

Re: httpd Protocols proposal

2015-07-22 Thread Stefan Eissing
So, a RUN_ALL that collects willing protocols pre_select, a ALL for post_select and a FIRST for switch? Am 22.07.2015 um 18:02 schrieb Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com: On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Stefan Eissing stefan.eiss...@greenbytes.de wrote: Hmm, that would mean first come,

Re: httpd Protocols proposal

2015-07-22 Thread Yann Ylavic
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 4:07 PM, Stefan Eissing stefan.eiss...@greenbytes.de wrote: Key points: - Integrates TLS+ALPN and HTTP/1 Upgrade: header - Allows upgrades on clean connection and in the middle of a request. Implementors might chose to only support one or the other or both - Protocol

Re: httpd Protocols proposal

2015-07-22 Thread Stefan Eissing
Hmm, that would mean first come, first negotiated? Am 22.07.2015 um 17:13 schrieb Yann Ylavic ylavic@gmail.com: On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 4:07 PM, Stefan Eissing stefan.eiss...@greenbytes.de wrote: Key points: - Integrates TLS+ALPN and HTTP/1 Upgrade: header - Allows upgrades on clean

Re: httpd Protocols proposal

2015-07-22 Thread Yann Ylavic
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 6:42 PM, Stefan Eissing stefan.eiss...@greenbytes.de wrote: So, a RUN_ALL that collects willing protocols pre_select, a ALL for post_select post_select is to announce the selected one, right? That looks good to me. and a FIRST for switch? Isn't the core doing the

Re: httpd Protocols proposal

2015-07-22 Thread Stefan Eissing
Am 22.07.2015 um 19:00 schrieb Yann Ylavic ylavic@gmail.com: On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 6:42 PM, Stefan Eissing stefan.eiss...@greenbytes.de wrote: So, a RUN_ALL that collects willing protocols pre_select, a ALL for post_select post_select is to announce the selected one, right? That

Re: httpd Protocols proposal

2015-07-22 Thread Yann Ylavic
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 9:37 PM, Stefan Eissing stefan.eiss...@greenbytes.de wrote: Am 22.07.2015 um 19:00 schrieb Yann Ylavic ylavic@gmail.com: On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 6:42 PM, Stefan Eissing stefan.eiss...@greenbytes.de wrote: So, a RUN_ALL that collects willing protocols pre_select, a

Re: Recommended version of Perl for test framework

2015-07-22 Thread Michael Felt
I have been installing Bundle::ApacheTest on AIX 5.3, with perl-5.8.2 and the tests seem to be working normally for me. There have been some // comment errors pop-up in a few mods, and a define that AIX does not like with a few mods. But other than those typos the only problem I have had is with

Re: Recommended version of Perl for test framework

2015-07-22 Thread Stefan Eissing
My OS X setup, may it help find the cause of problems: - httpd/trunk built with prefix/opt/apachte-trunk with --*really*-build-and-load-all-modules and then all but one mpm commented out - test/framework/trunk build with /opt/apache-trunk/bin/apxs all extra modules installed/updated with

Re: Recommended version of Perl for test framework

2015-07-22 Thread Jim Jagielski
Nothing stands out... weird. I may try compiling on my own. System Perl: Compiler: cc='cc', ccflags ='-arch x86_64 -arch i386 -g -pipe -fno-common -DPERL_DARWIN -fno-strict-aliasing -fstack-protector', optimize='-Os', cppflags='-g -pipe -fno-common -DPERL_DARWIN

Re: mod_ssl: How to react on default OpenSSL SSL_CTX_set_options?

2015-07-22 Thread Jan Kaluža
On 07/21/2015 04:07 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 2:50 PM, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group ruediger.pl...@vodafone.com wrote: I would go for 2. +1 Done in http://svn.apache.org/r1692258. Regards, Jan Kaluza

Re: Recommended version of Perl for test framework

2015-07-22 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Jul 22, 2015, at 8:21 AM, Kevin A. McGrail kmcgr...@pccc.com wrote: On 7/22/2015 6:43 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: Nothing stands out... weird. I may try compiling on my own. Well, the gccversion is different. clang-600.0.54 v clang-600.0.39 I doubt that's causing the problem. In any

Re: Recommended version of Perl for test framework

2015-07-22 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
On 7/22/2015 6:43 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: Nothing stands out... weird. I may try compiling on my own. Well, the gccversion is different. clang-600.0.54 v clang-600.0.39 Regards, KAM