On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 9:41 AM, Stefan Eissing
stefan.eiss...@greenbytes.de wrote:
mod_test_session.c did some non C90 variable declarations intermixed with
code. I'll check in the fix shortly. Btw. what is holding us back from more
recent C? Old platforms, obviously... Do we have an idea
Just a tiny question how the senior guys here do to:
If I build httpd in maintainer-mode (which I want), the test framework will no
longer build since it inherits the compiler flags from apxs, I assume.
Is there an easy way around this?
//Stefan
green/bytes GmbH
Hafenweg 16, 48155 Münster,
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 9:23 AM, Stefan Eissing
stefan.eiss...@greenbytes.de wrote:
Just a tiny question how the senior guys here do to:
If I build httpd in maintainer-mode (which I want), the test framework will
no longer build since it inherits the compiler flags from apxs, I assume.
Is
OK, now you made me fix it. ;-)
mod_test_session.c did some non C90 variable declarations intermixed with code.
I'll check in the fix shortly. Btw. what is holding us back from more recent C?
Old platforms, obviously... Do we have an idea which?
Am 24.08.2015 um 15:24 schrieb Eric Covener
I seem to get
Test Summary Report
---
t/filter/case.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 4 Failed: 1)
Failed test: 2
in regression tests since my vacation. Anything rings a bell?
green/bytes GmbH
Hafenweg 16, 48155 Münster, Germany
Phone: +49 251 2807760. Amtsgericht Münster:
On Aug 24, 2015 08:45, Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 9:41 AM, Stefan Eissing
stefan.eiss...@greenbytes.de wrote:
mod_test_session.c did some non C90 variable declarations intermixed
with code. I'll check in the fix shortly. Btw. what is holding us back from
Hi,
unfortunately, the r1680920 brought undesired behavior described in PR
58267 to 2.2.x. The bug is well described in the PR, so I won't describe
it in this email.
I have tried to debug it and I think the problem is that we use also
server-server_hostname to compute the hash in the
On 08/24/2015 04:47 PM, Jan Kaluža wrote:
Hi,
unfortunately, the r1680920 brought undesired behavior described in PR
58267 to 2.2.x. The bug is well described in the PR, so I won't describe
it in this email.
I have tried to debug it and I think the problem is that we use also
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 11:21 AM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
think it would be better if httpd core (${x}) and mod_rewrite (%{x}) could
stay as-is and mod_macro would support yet another prefix like .
+1
--
Eric Covener
cove...@gmail.com
Am 24.08.2015 um 13:40 schrieb Nick Gearls:
This is definitely a bug as we have a major incompatibility between two
features.
Remark: although mod_macro can use $ and % for unescaped characters,
${x} is used by Define and %{x} by mod_rewrite :-(
Shooting from the hip:
{x}
Haven't checked
Hi Jan,
I was working on the same issue... and was going to implement 2) :)
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 4:47 PM, Jan Kaluža jkal...@redhat.com wrote:
Now, the root of the error is that the scoreboard size is static (set to
proxy_lb_workers + PROXY_DYNAMIC_BALANCER_LIMIT), but it is not
As you might have noticed, I am doing some cleanup work on mod_h2 and want to
create THE PATCH for backporting soon. The new core directives Protocols and
ProtocolsHonorOrder are implemented, such as on a server or virtual host one
may write
Protocols h2c http/1.1 # enable h2c and
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Stefan Eissing
stefan.eiss...@greenbytes.de wrote:
I hope this works for everyone. The next weeks might be a good time to think
about it and propose any changes and correct my mistakes.
Look good in concept to me
Hi, Yann and thanks for the review.
Le 21/08/2015 15:47, Yann Ylavic a écrit :
On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 12:05 AM, jaillet...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jailletc36
Date: Sat Aug 15 22:05:08 2015
New Revision: 1696105
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1696105
[]
Modified:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 8:07 PM, Ruediger Pluem rpl...@apache.org wrote:
On 08/21/2015 07:02 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 4:15 PM, Ruediger Pluem rpl...@apache.org wrote:
Hm. Doesn't that mean that if I keep on adding stuff and do graceful
restarts that at one point in
Ni Norm,
yes, I removed it last week and though I removed it from the doc xml as well.
Seems I forgot the Readme. Will fix soon. Sorry for any confusion.
//Stefan
Am 24.08.2015 um 05:53 schrieb NormW no...@gknw.net:
Hi,
The 'H2Engine on' directive is identified in the Readme.h2 as the
Hi Stefan,
Thanks for the clarification!
A text search for 'H2Engine' shows it in a number of other languages
under '.\manual\mod\directives', 'manual\mod\quickreference' and in
'\docs\conf\extra\httpd-h2.conf.in'.
HTH,
Thanks,
Norm
On 24/08/2015 6:06 PM, Stefan Eissing wrote:
Ni Norm,
yes,
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 8:17 AM, Christophe JAILLET
christophe.jail...@wanadoo.fr wrote:
Le 21/08/2015 15:47, Yann Ylavic a écrit :
On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 12:05 AM, jaillet...@apache.org wrote:
+if ((i 1) || (i 1800)) {
Why a limit of 1800? Maybe the implicit INT_MAX is good
On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 07:40:33 -
rpl...@apache.org wrote:
--- httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS (original)
+++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS Mon Aug 24 07:40:33 2015
@@ -238,8 +238,15 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
+1: rpluem, ylavic
niq: 1. the
This is definitely a bug as we have a major incompatibility between two
features.
Remark: although mod_macro can use $ and % for unescaped characters,
${x} is used by Define and %{x} by mod_rewrite :-(
I suppose the preferred solution to not be incompatible with the current
situation would be
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 7:40 AM, Nick Gearls nickgea...@gmail.com wrote:
Remark: although mod_macro can use $ and % for unescaped characters, ${x} is
used by Define and %{x} by mod_rewrite :-(
Just to make sure it's clear, ${x} is even older then Define and is
used to resolve real native
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 5:51 PM, Yann Ylavic ylavic@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 4:47 PM, Jan Kaluža jkal...@redhat.com wrote:
2) Increment proxy_lb_workers according to number of workers in balancer
when using ProxyPass /foobar/ Balancer://foobar/ in the VirtualHost. The
Le 24/08/2015 11:18, Yann Ylavic a écrit :
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 8:17 AM, Christophe JAILLET
christophe.jail...@wanadoo.fr wrote:
Le 21/08/2015 15:47, Yann Ylavic a écrit :
On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 12:05 AM, jaillet...@apache.org wrote:
+if ((i 1) || (i 1800)) {
Why a limit of 1800?
Hi,
On 8/24/2015 9:29 AM, Stefan Eissing wrote:
I hope this works for everyone. The next weeks might be a good time to think
about it and propose any changes and correct my mistakes.
There are two things that go bump on my lowest non-eol version of MSVC.
h2_worker.c
.\h2_worker.c(113) :
24 matches
Mail list logo