Re: httpd and letsencrypt

Anything new on this? On Sep 15, 2016 00:35, "Dale Ghent" wrote: > > Apologies from necro’ing this thread, I’m just catching up. > > As a maintainer/user of a lesser-known open source OS (OmniOS, based on > illumos, which is the carry-on of what you all might remember as >

Hackathon tomorrow?

If you're around Apachecon Tomorrow please consider dropping by the hackathon area on floor -2 to work on the items in https://public.etherpad-mozilla.org/p/aceu-2016-hackathon Thanks.

Re: apreq release

[Resending from an address that's actually subscribed to the lists...] The current mod_perl release (2.0.10) is taken from trunk. (The httpd24 branch was only for development work leading towards the previous release (2.0.9), and is now obsolete.) On 17 November 2016 at 09:03, Issac Goldstand

Re: apreq release

[Resending from an address that's actually subscribed to the lists...] The current mod_perl release (2.0.10) is taken from trunk. (The httpd24 branch was only for development work leading towards the previous release (2.0.9), and is now obsolete.) On 17 November 2016 at 09:03, Issac Goldstand

Re: svn commit: r1768036 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x-merge-http-strict: ./ CHANGES include/ap_mmn.h include/http_core.h include/httpd.h modules/http/http_filters.c server/core.c server/protocol.c

On Nov 16, 2016 20:29, "Jacob Champion" wrote: > > On 11/16/2016 05:01 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: >> >> We need to tolerate their presence. But we should ignore the guidance that >> sf originally quoted, that the URI host supersedes the Host header, it does >> not, they

Re: apreq release

That was my knee-jerk reaction, too, but after digging, I saw that win32 really shouldn't be affected. On 11/16/2016 4:09 PM, Steve Hay wrote: > On 15 November 2016 at 09:26, Issac Goldstand wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Someone (finally) noticed that apreq's test suite isn't

Re: apreq release

Yes, if we go through with this. The mod_apreq2 stuff is in httpd. However I just realized that although it's been in trunk for years now, it's never been backported to the 2.4.x branch. I'm not sure why, and my google-fu isn't finding relevant discussion on dev@httpd. When I initially took a