+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
G/A...
On 17/12/2016 5:38 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
Erm... did you miss the same edit to mod_socache_memcache.mak?
(Just catching up on the flurry of traffic, so this is speculation.)
Further speculation, are we solid for NetWare now? Any word, Norm?
Have clean build and 'install' on 2.4.x
t/TEST -clean might help
On Dec 17, 2016 19:32, "Eric Covener" wrote:
> I think your t/conf/extra.conf is out of date and has the +ExecCGI
> masked out by . So you are getting the perl script
> instead of its output setting nasty headers.
>
> On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 8:27 PM,
I think your t/conf/extra.conf is out of date and has the +ExecCGI
masked out by . So you are getting the perl script
instead of its output setting nasty headers.
On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 8:27 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Dec 2016 18:35:22 -0600
> William A Rowe Jr
On Sat, 17 Dec 2016 18:35:22 -0600
William A Rowe Jr wrote:
> On Dec 17, 2016 17:22, "Nick Kew" wrote:
>
>
> Got some test errors with the new stuff. Investigating.
>
> Test Summary Report
> ---
> t/apache/http_strict.t
On Dec 17, 2016 17:22, "Nick Kew" wrote:
Got some test errors with the new stuff. Investigating.
Test Summary Report
---
t/apache/http_strict.t(Wstat: 0 Tests: 78 Failed: 5)
Failed tests: 72-75, 77
Really should not occur and I haven't seen
On Sat, 17 Dec 2016 23:21:09 +
Nick Kew wrote:
> Got some test errors with the new stuff. Investigating.
>
> Test Summary Report
> ---
> t/apache/http_strict.t(Wstat: 0 Tests: 78 Failed: 5)
> Failed tests: 72-75, 77
The fails are:
[ "R"
On Fri, 16 Dec 2016 13:29:04 -0500
Jim Jagielski wrote:
> At long, long last, the pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd
> version 2.4.25 can be found at the usual place:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 1:29 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> [ ] +1: Good to go
+1. Tested on aix/xlc/ppc64. No regressions (modulo new 413 ext_filter tests)
--
Eric Covener
cove...@gmail.com
Bonus reminder; if you are working from an existing checkout, top level
Makefile.PL plus make must be rerun to provision all new tests correctly.
On Dec 17, 2016 7:13 AM, "Jim Jagielski" wrote:
> As a reminder, when Joe added those tests a few days ago,
> it was for:
>
>
Am 16.12.2016 um 19:29 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
At long, long last, the pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd
version 2.4.25 can be found at the usual place:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.25 GA.
[x] +1: Good to go
[ ]
As a reminder, when Joe added those tests a few days ago,
it was for:
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1774010=rev
Log:
Add basic test case for mod_ext_filter & specific test for PR 60375.
> On Dec 17, 2016, at 7:35 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
>
> Am
+1:
o CentOS5, x64 - event, worker
o CentOS6, x64 - event, worker
o CentOS7, x64 - event
o macOS 10.12, x64 - event, worker
No regressions (mod_ext_filter test failures aren't regressions)
> On Dec 16, 2016, at 1:29 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> At long, long last, the
Those failures do not reflect a regression.
> On Dec 16, 2016, at 3:11 PM, Jacob Champion wrote:
>
> On 12/16/2016 10:29 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.25 GA.
>
> mod_ext_filter tests are failing for me on Ubuntu
Am 17.12.2016 um 10:46 schrieb Marion & Christophe JAILLET:
Proposed fix in r1774728.
A solution, stating that the tests have been skipped because of sed
location, would be better, though.
I switched the test to using a simple perl script instead of sed, so
that we have no platform
Proposed fix in r1774728.
A solution, stating that the tests have been skipped because of sed
location, would be better, though.
CJ
Le 16/12/2016 à 21:46, Jacob Champion a écrit :
On 12/16/2016 12:44 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
I expect this is a bug in the 2.4.x branch. However, I found
16 matches
Mail list logo