Re: Announce missing - in moderation?

FWIW, this was a straight forward multi-To field email message addressed to both lists. If there is a way I can improve the announce/release automation, I am happy to do so. Maybe a better way is to send multiple messages? -- Daniel Ruggeri On September 25, 2018 7:12:25 PM EDT, William A Rowe

Re: Announce missing - in moderation?

Agreed it was published to ann@httpd.a.o, likely Jim's approval. It has not arrived at a...@apache.org. Sebb, can you shed any light on this moderation issue? On Tue, Sep 25, 2018, 12:29 Jim Jagielski wrote: > FWIW, I just saw a mod request for *an* announcement and approved it > > On Sep

Re: Announce missing - in moderation?

FWIW, I just saw a mod request for *an* announcement and approved it > On Sep 25, 2018, at 12:19 PM, Private LIst Moderation > wrote: > > Hi Daniel, > > I've looked in the moderation queue and did not find the announce@ moderation > email. > > Craig > >> On Sep 25, 2018, at 7:00 AM, Daniel

Re: svn commit: r1841225 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/dav/main/props.c

We learned a lot about pool handling while writing Subversion, after I wrote that mod_dav code. There are definite some improvements to be made. I'm not surprised that a propfind can go nuts like that ... I'll review the change and take a look generally. h/t to DanielR for the pointer to this

Re: Announce missing - in moderation?

Hi Daniel, I've looked in the moderation queue and did not find the announce@ moderation email. Craig > On Sep 25, 2018, at 7:00 AM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > > Infra points out it's easier to just resend than to dig out the message they > found on the server. I've sent again - receiving

Re: CVE-2018-11763: mod_http2, DoS via continuous SETTINGS frames

I'm confused. Why are there no changes to mod_http2 mentioned in: http://www.apache.org/dist//httpd/CHANGES_2.4.35 to presumably address this CVE? Or does one of the other changes cover this? (No as far as I can see but could be

Re: Announce missing - in moderation?

Infra points out it's easier to just resend than to dig out the message they found on the server. I've sent again - receiving these confirmations: < 235 2.7.0 Authentication successful MAIL FROM: SIZE=2919 < 250 2.1.0 Ok RCPT TO: < 250 2.1.5 Ok DATA < 354 End data with . } [data not

Re: Review

On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 1:25 PM, Graham Leggett wrote: > On 25 Sep 2018, at 12:17, Andrei Ivanov wrote: > > I'm trying again to bring this to your attention, hoping that you might > have a bit of time to take a look at the following changes made by Yann and > possibly get them into 2.4.x. > >

Re: Review

On 25 Sep 2018, at 12:17, Andrei Ivanov wrote: > I'm trying again to bring this to your attention, hoping that you might have > a bit of time to take a look at the following changes made by Yann and > possibly get them into 2.4.x. > > http://svn.apache.org/r1810605 >

Review

Hi, I'm trying again to bring this to your attention, hoping that you might have a bit of time to take a look at the following changes made by Yann and possibly get them into 2.4.x. http://svn.apache.org/r1810605 http://svn.apache.org/r1811104 http://svn.apache.org/r1811105 I hope I didn't break