Re: Plan to add sandbox branch

2018-11-28 Thread Christophe JAILLET
Le 28/11/2018 à 02:33, Daniel Ruggeri a écrit : Hi, Jim; I'm coming up empty on a search against the Google-machine for SURVEY protocol. Any pointers you can share? Hi Not sure if the answers already posted are what you are looking for. Here are some links:

Re: Plan to add sandbox branch

2018-11-28 Thread Alex Hautequest
How often are nodes updating themselves? Are they only updating their main proxy server or each other in a “multicast” fashion? How about if one of the nodes crash before sending back an update? Are you locking a session to a specific backend host, keep it tracked on the proxy/front end server

Server Token: None

2018-11-28 Thread Alex Hautequest
Can we have an empty SERVER header instead of the minimalistic but yet “revealing“ issued by the token when set as Prod? Most people are change this header either by patching themselves (and maintaining their patches), or by installing extra modules/plugins, but it would be very, very handy if

Re: Plan to add sandbox branch

2018-11-28 Thread Jim Jagielski
https://nanomsg.org > On Nov 27, 2018, at 8:33 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > > Hi, Jim; > I'm coming up empty on a search against the Google-machine for SURVEY > protocol. Any pointers you can share? > > I'm also curious what your thoughts are about dealing with growth of the > worker pool

Re: Time To Propose Your ApacheCon 2019 Project Summit

2018-11-28 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
We've traditionally had a day or two of content for httpd... has anyone added an item to the form? I cannot see the backing database/spreadsheet in the apachecon gsuite location... If not, I can propose and coordinate the track... hopefully with others (Daniel?, Bill?) who are also on

Re: Plan to add sandbox branch

2018-11-28 Thread Michal Karm
On 11/28/2018 02:33 AM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > Hi, Jim; > I'm coming up empty on a search against the Google-machine for SURVEY > protocol. Any pointers you can share? > > I'm also curious what your thoughts are about dealing with growth of the > worker pool beyond the control of the proxy admin.