On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 3:56 PM Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>
>
>
> On 03/13/2019 07:41 PM, cove...@apache.org wrote:
> > Author: covener
> > Date: Wed Mar 13 18:41:30 2019
> > New Revision: 1855449
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1855449=rev
> > Log:
> > mod_mime: Add `MimeOptions`
On 03/13/2019 07:41 PM, cove...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: covener
> Date: Wed Mar 13 18:41:30 2019
> New Revision: 1855449
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1855449=rev
> Log:
> mod_mime: Add `MimeOptions`
>
> mod_mime: Add `MimeOptions` directive to allow Content-Type or all
To take this discussion all the way back to APR project's potential
concerns...
On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 8:03 AM Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> > On Mar 13, 2019, at 8:56 AM, Nick Kew wrote:
> >
> >> On 13 Mar 2019, at 12:43, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> >>
> >> Is there anyone else building 2.4 on macOS
> On Mar 13, 2019, at 11:04 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
>
>
> As you can see, you didn't modify only modules/filters/ ... Maybe you
> meant to modify MOD_CPPFLAGS, as modules/http2/modules.mak does?
>
If that will solve the issue I'm all for it!
Thx.
Just as a reminder of what r1850745 actually did, from an old discussion;
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 5:09 PM William A Rowe Jr
wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 3:54 PM Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>> I'm sorry but I'm confused. The patch is as specific as you can get. It
>> just adds the minimal option
On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 8:04 AM Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> Yeah, I also think it depends on the version of clang... previous versions
> did not flag
>
> /usr/local/include/unicode/uenum.h:1:1: error: // comments are not
> allowed in this language [-Werror,-Wcomment]
>
> as fatal errors.
Just
> Am 13.03.2019 um 15:41 schrieb Yann Ylavic :
>
> Got Jim's and my votes, could be merged now ;)
> Please note that the CHANGES entries from the patch are slightly mixed
> with unrelated changes, should be cleaned up when backporting.
> Nice changes otherwise, thanks!
Thanks, Yann! Will do!
>
Got Jim's and my votes, could be merged now ;)
Please note that the CHANGES entries from the patch are slightly mixed
with unrelated changes, should be cleaned up when backporting.
Nice changes otherwise, thanks!
On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 2:05 PM Stefan Eissing
wrote:
>
> Proposal updated in
Proposal updated in 1855417.
> Am 13.03.2019 um 13:46 schrieb Stefan Eissing :
>
>
>> Am 13.03.2019 um 13:32 schrieb Yann Ylavic :
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 12:55 PM Yann Ylavic wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 12:49 PM Stefan Eissing
>>> wrote:
It would be nice if 2
> On Mar 13, 2019, at 8:51 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 1:45 PM Eric Covener wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 8:43 AM Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>>
>>> Is there anyone else building 2.4 on macOS under maintainer-mode
>>> who is also being affected by the above? The
It's libxml2 from MacPorts... which is basically vanilla libxml2.
APR is 1.6.x
> On Mar 13, 2019, at 8:56 AM, Nick Kew wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 13 Mar 2019, at 12:43, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>
>> Is there anyone else building 2.4 on macOS under maintainer-mode
>> who is also being affected by the
> On 13 Mar 2019, at 12:43, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> Is there anyone else building 2.4 on macOS under maintainer-mode
> who is also being affected by the above? The fact that I seem to
> be the anyone "complaining" :) seems weird...
>
> Thx!
Just out of interest, is that with a
On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 1:45 PM Eric Covener wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 8:43 AM Jim Jagielski wrote:
> >
> > Is there anyone else building 2.4 on macOS under maintainer-mode
> > who is also being affected by the above? The fact that I seem to
> > be the anyone "complaining" :) seems
> Am 13.03.2019 um 13:32 schrieb Yann Ylavic :
>
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 12:55 PM Yann Ylavic wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 12:49 PM Stefan Eissing
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> It would be nice if 2 people could find the time to have a look at it.
>>
>> I'm currently reviewing it, looks good
On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 8:43 AM Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> Is there anyone else building 2.4 on macOS under maintainer-mode
> who is also being affected by the above? The fact that I seem to
> be the anyone "complaining" :) seems weird...
FWIW Looks like I have maintainer mode but not libxml2
Is there anyone else building 2.4 on macOS under maintainer-mode
who is also being affected by the above? The fact that I seem to
be the anyone "complaining" :) seems weird...
Thx!
On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 12:55 PM Yann Ylavic wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 12:49 PM Stefan Eissing
> wrote:
> >
> > It would be nice if 2 people could find the time to have a look at it.
>
> I'm currently reviewing it, looks good so far, nice!
Looks like the proposal reverts r1852989,
On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 12:49 PM Stefan Eissing
wrote:
>
> It would be nice if 2 people could find the time to have a look at it.
I'm currently reviewing it, looks good so far, nice!
Cheers.
There is a mod_http2/mod_proxy_http2 backport proposal in 2.4.x/STATUS
that accumulates this years changes from the github version. This
includes several bugfixes, 2 of which from Michael Kaufmann (Thanks!),
for issues reported:
*) mod_http2: HEAD requests to some module such as mod_cgid
19 matches
Mail list logo
