I can always do my "httpd 2.4 overview" as well as my "httpd 2.4 reverse proxy"
talk.
> On May 2, 2019, at 10:39 AM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
>
> Hi, Rich;
> I was looking at the CFP and didn't quite see something that aligns with
> httpd. These are the categories allowed:
> General
>
Thanks, Yann. Just proposed these for backport.
> Am 09.05.2019 um 12:04 schrieb Yann Ylavic :
>
> r1707362
C2 General
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Yann Ylavic
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 9. Mai 2019 12:00
> An: httpd-dev
> Betreff: Re: eor bucket
>
> On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 11:54 AM Yann Ylavic
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 11:37 AM Stefan Eissing
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Am
C2 General
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Yann Ylavic
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 9. Mai 2019 11:54
> An: httpd-dev
> Betreff: Re: eor bucket
>
> On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 11:37 AM Stefan Eissing
> wrote:
> >
> > > Am 09.05.2019 um 11:32 schrieb Yann Ylavic :
> > >
> > > The issue is
On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 12:00 PM Yann Ylavic wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 11:54 AM Yann Ylavic wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 11:37 AM Stefan Eissing
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Am 09.05.2019 um 11:32 schrieb Yann Ylavic :
> > > >
> > > > The issue is more that the hooks in
On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 11:54 AM Yann Ylavic wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 11:37 AM Stefan Eissing
> wrote:
> >
> > > Am 09.05.2019 um 11:32 schrieb Yann Ylavic :
> > >
> > > The issue is more that the hooks in eor_bucket_cleanup() will be run
> > > multiple times, rather than a lifetime
On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 11:37 AM Stefan Eissing
wrote:
>
> > Am 09.05.2019 um 11:32 schrieb Yann Ylavic :
> >
> > The issue is more that the hooks in eor_bucket_cleanup() will be run
> > multiple times, rather than a lifetime issue.
>
> I read it like this:
> The cleanup is only registered on the
> Am 09.05.2019 um 11:32 schrieb Yann Ylavic :
>
> The issue is more that the hooks in eor_bucket_cleanup() will be run
> multiple times, rather than a lifetime issue.
I read it like this:
The cleanup is only registered on the first creation. The copy never registers.
But the bucket_destroy
The issue is more that the hooks in eor_bucket_cleanup() will be run
multiple times, rather than a lifetime issue.
On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 11:28 AM Yann Ylavic wrote:
>
> No it's not actually, nevermind.
>
> On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 11:24 AM Yann Ylavic wrote:
> >
> > Hmm, if r->pool gets
> Am 09.05.2019 um 11:28 schrieb Yann Ylavic :
>
> No it's not actually, nevermind.
Yeah, I was going back and forth like that myself. Therefore my question. ;)
I am seeing in an uncomitted change a rare occasion where eor_bucket_destroy()
seems to destroy a pool twice. If that is related
No it's not actually, nevermind.
On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 11:24 AM Yann Ylavic wrote:
>
> Hmm, if r->pool gets destroyed by the first eor, the
> eor_bucket_cleanup() for the copy should NULLify its b->data at the
> same time, so it should be safe no?
>
> On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 11:22 AM Plüm,
Hmm, if r->pool gets destroyed by the first eor, the
eor_bucket_cleanup() for the copy should NULLify its b->data at the
same time, so it should be safe no?
On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 11:22 AM Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group
wrote:
>
> I think your understanding is correct.
>
> Regards
>
> Rüdiger
>
>
I think your understanding is correct.
Regards
Rüdiger
C2 General
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Stefan Eissing
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 9. Mai 2019 11:02
> An: dev@httpd.apache.org
> Betreff: eor bucket
>
> Could someone help me to check my understanding of the eor bucket
>
Could someone help me to check my understanding of the eor bucket
implementation?
If an eor bucket is ever copied, there are 2 buckets with their b->data
pointing to the request_rec. Since this is local to the bucket, destroying
these 2 will call apr_pool_destroy() twice on the pool. Correct?
14 matches
Mail list logo
