Re: svn commit: r1801594 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: docs/manual/mod/mod_proxy_wstunnel.xml modules/proxy/mod_proxy_wstunnel.c

2019-11-03 Thread jean-frederic clere
On 01/11/2019 21:15, Yann Ylavic wrote: Hi Jean-Frédéric, sorry to dig up an old commit, I'm currently working on integrating wstunnel into mod_proxy_http and wondering what is the use case for upgrade=NONE. Please see below... The upgrade=NONE was added to work around

Re: Time for httpd 2.6.x?

2019-11-03 Thread Luca Toscano
Il giorno dom 3 nov 2019 alle ore 18:52 Jim Jagielski ha scritto: > > > > On Nov 1, 2019, at 11:59 AM, Luca Toscano wrote: > > Il giorno mar 29 ott 2019 alle ore 18:31 Graham Leggett > ha scritto: > > > On 29 Oct 2019, at 15:51, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > My only question regards workflow w/

Re: Time for httpd 2.6.x?

2019-11-03 Thread Jim Jagielski
> On Nov 1, 2019, at 11:59 AM, Luca Toscano wrote: > > Il giorno mar 29 ott 2019 alle ore 18:31 Graham Leggett > mailto:minf...@sharp.fm>> ha scritto: >> >> On 29 Oct 2019, at 15:51, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> >>> My only question regards workflow w/ trunk. Right now, I think we all agree >>>

Re: Testing module without Apache

2019-11-03 Thread Ervin Hegedüs
Dear Sorin, first, many-many thanks for your answer :) On Sat, Nov 02, 2019 at 11:37:26AM +0100, Sorin Manolache wrote: > On 02/11/2019 11.00, Ervin Hegedüs wrote: > >Hi, > > > >this is just a theoretical question: is there any way to test/use > >an Apache module without Apache?n > > AFAIK no,

Bug report for Apache httpd-2 [2019/11/03]

2019-11-03 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned