Add it in :-)
> On Nov 24, 2021, at 4:46 AM, ste...@eissing.org wrote:
>
> Coming back to this. Since there was no feedback on my post: are people
> just too occupied/opposed/not interested?
>
> Curious,
> Stefan
>
>> Am 18.11.2021 um 18:48 schrieb ste...@eissing.org:
>>
>> How would you feel
On 18 Nov 2021, at 19:48, ste...@eissing.org wrote:
> How would you feel about adding mod_tls
> (https://github.com/abetterinternet/mod_tls) as an experimental module to
> Apache httpd?
Having more choice is excellent.
> For people who have not followed that development:
> - it is a TLS
On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 11:19:17AM +0100, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> However what would be a discussion without a naming dispute, mod_rustls? :p
Agreed. At least as long as it's an experimental module. If it ever
moves beyond experimental, then a rename back to mod_tls might make
sense.
vh
Mads
Hi Stefan,
sorry for the lateness..
On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 10:46 AM ste...@eissing.org wrote:
>
> Coming back to this. Since there was no feedback on my post: are people
> just too occupied/opposed/not interested?
I looked at the code diagonally and it looks good to me (I like it and
the
> Am 24.11.2021 um 10:57 schrieb Joe Orton :
>
> Possibly no strong opinions? +1 from me anyway.
>
> How hard is it going to be to test in Travis?
I have a test suite that can be added to our test/modules. Then
we need to bring the rust tool chain into the test image and
checkout/create the
Possibly no strong opinions? +1 from me anyway.
How hard is it going to be to test in Travis?
On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 10:46:03AM +0100, ste...@eissing.org wrote:
> Coming back to this. Since there was no feedback on my post: are people
> just too occupied/opposed/not interested?
>
> Curious,
>
Coming back to this. Since there was no feedback on my post: are people
just too occupied/opposed/not interested?
Curious,
Stefan
> Am 18.11.2021 um 18:48 schrieb ste...@eissing.org:
>
> How would you feel about adding mod_tls
> (https://github.com/abetterinternet/mod_tls) as an experimental
