Hi there,
mod_jk for example uses such aging, but only for the non busyness case.
busyness is meant to show the number of currently in-flight requests, so
aging isn't a good fit there. Old load numbers are never part of
busyness. But busyness is the mode that is most sensitive to the numer
IIRC, the goal of having an "aging" function was to handle this exact kind of
thing, where values could be normalized over a long period of time so that old
entries that may skew results are not weighted as heavily as new ones.
> On Aug 30, 2023, at 11:19 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>
>
Isn't the call to find the best balancer mutex protected?
> On Aug 31, 2023, at 7:44 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>
> On 8/30/23 17:33, Rainer Jung wrote:
>> Hi JFC,
>> I have not checked ur current code, but the topic reminds me of our history
>> in mod_jk land. There we switched the
On 8/30/23 17:33, Rainer Jung wrote:
Hi JFC,
I have not checked ur current code, but the topic reminds me of our
history in mod_jk land. There we switched the counters to atomics were
available. The other problematic part could be how to handle process
local counters versus global counters.
