On 2013/01/21, at 19:03, Daniel Gruno rum...@cord.dk wrote:
On 01/21/2013 07:32 AM, 松本 亮介 wrote:
Hi Daniel.
Thank you for your comment.
I have tried to compile and install mod_mruby on my own machine to test
it, but there are too many compiler errors for it to work :( In
particular
matsu1229 at gmail.com
http://blog.matsumoto-r.jp/
On 2013/01/21, at 19:29, 松本 亮介 matsu1...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2013/01/21, at 19:03, Daniel Gruno rum...@cord.dk wrote:
On 01/21/2013 07:32 AM, 松本 亮介 wrote:
Hi Daniel.
Thank you for your comment.
I have tried to compile and install
On 2013/01/21, at 22:03, Daniel Gruno rum...@cord.dk wrote:
On 01/21/2013 01:59 PM, 松本 亮介 wrote:
Hi Daniel,
I tested benchmark of mod_mruby.
test case are: snip
My main concern here is; is it thread-safe (or even thread-aware)?
Most people will be using 2.4 with the event MPM, which
On 2013/01/21, at 22:17, MATSUMOTO Ryosuke matsu1...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2013/01/21, at 22:03, Daniel Gruno rum...@cord.dk wrote:
On 01/21/2013 01:59 PM, 松本 亮介 wrote:
Hi Daniel,
I tested benchmark of mod_mruby.
test case are: snip
My main concern here is; is it thread-safe (or even
Hi Daniel.
Thank you for your comment.
I have tried to compile and install mod_mruby on my own machine to test
it, but there are too many compiler errors for it to work :( In
particular, you have a lot of declarations after statements in your
code, which is not C90 compliant, and needs
+1
it's awesome!
MATSUMOTO Ryosuke matsu1229 at gmail.com
http://blog.matsumoto-r.jp/
On 2013/01/05, at 18:30, Igor Galić i.ga...@brainsware.org wrote:
+1
- Original Message -
I was preparing the IP clearance forms and noticed our original
vote
thread was more of a
