On Mar 29, 2009, at 1:32 PM, Paul Querna wrote:
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 7:28 PM, ntwrkd ntw...@gmail.com wrote:
Can you explain why this would not be accomplishable through
mod_proxy_balancer and would merit it's own module?
1) it is not currently possibly to add proxy workers without a
On Mar 29, 2009, at 11:43 AM, Paul Querna wrote:
URL Authentication is done by computing an randomly seeded md5
signature of:
seed + $+ MD5(seed + shared_secret + uri)
This is base64 encoded, and placed in a 'X-Cloudbeat-Auth' header.
Thinking outloud here... The idea I think is to
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 4:45 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
On Mar 29, 2009, at 11:43 AM, Paul Querna wrote:
URL Authentication is done by computing an randomly seeded md5 signature
of:
seed + $+ MD5(seed + shared_secret + uri)
This is base64 encoded, and placed in a
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Paul Querna
Gesendet: Montag, 30. März 2009 17:04
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [PROPOSAL] mod_cloudbeat
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 4:45 PM, Jim Jagielski
j...@jagunet.com wrote:
On Mar 29, 2009, at 11:43 AM, Paul Querna wrote:
URL
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 5:10 PM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group
ruediger.pl...@vodafone.com wrote:
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Paul Querna
Gesendet: Montag, 30. März 2009 17:04
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [PROPOSAL] mod_cloudbeat
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 4:45 PM, Jim Jagielski
On Mar 30, 2009, at 10:45 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Mar 29, 2009, at 11:43 AM, Paul Querna wrote:
URL Authentication is done by computing an randomly seeded md5
signature of:
seed + $+ MD5(seed + shared_secret + uri)
This is base64 encoded, and placed in a 'X-Cloudbeat-Auth' header.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Paul Querna
Gesendet: Montag, 30. März 2009 17:18
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [PROPOSAL] mod_cloudbeat
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 5:10 PM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group
ruediger.pl...@vodafone.com wrote:
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 5:28 PM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group
ruediger.pl...@vodafone.com wrote:
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Paul Querna
Gesendet: Montag, 30. März 2009 17:18
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [PROPOSAL] mod_cloudbeat
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 5:10 PM, Plüm
On Mar 30, 2009, at 11:28 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
But it doesn't prevent A' that sniffed the traffic from A to B to
replay.
OTOH why fiddle with this auth stuff anyway. We could make it save by
using TLS and client certs.
Holy freholey! And I was worried about the overhead of
Jim Jagielski wrote:
due to the refactorings as well. Does it make sense to branch
off 2.4 before we go further?
Nah... 2.4? 3.0? That seems like a value judgement once things
stabilize.
We can leave out 'not yet ready' modules. We shouldn't leave out
the changes required to core; we
The Problem: You just bought into whole cloud computing craze. But how do you
load balance to this constantly changing fabric, without sysadmins
constantly changing
server configurations. Most generic cloud computing platforms , for
example Amazon EC2,
provide almost no way of load balancing
Paul Querna wrote:
The (vaporware) solution: mod_cloudbeat automatically finds all of your nodes,
both front end load balancers and backend application servers. All load
balancing is completely configurationless if using mod_serf -- you just
turn on a new application server instance, and
On Mar 29, 2009, at 9:00 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
Paul Querna wrote:
The (vaporware) solution: mod_cloudbeat automatically finds all of
your nodes,
both front end load balancers and backend application servers. All
load
balancing is completely configurationless if using mod_serf -- you
Can you explain why this would not be accomplishable through
mod_proxy_balancer and would merit it's own module?
I think also mod_rest_cache could be utilized to invalidate objects
throughout various cloud CDN's.
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 9:35 AM, Sander Temme scte...@apache.org wrote:
On Mar 29,
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 6:00 PM, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote:
Paul Querna wrote:
The (vaporware) solution: mod_cloudbeat automatically finds all of your
nodes,
both front end load balancers and backend application servers. All load
balancing is completely configurationless if
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 7:28 PM, ntwrkd ntw...@gmail.com wrote:
Can you explain why this would not be accomplishable through
mod_proxy_balancer and would merit it's own module?
1) it is not currently possibly to add proxy workers without a
graceful restart, meaning you either need to script or
Paul Querna wrote:
no, this is just a utility module, which tells you where other members are.
second, mod_backhand has never been ported to 2.x, and it does allow
you to autoconfigure on cloud-enviroments, which mostly do not have
private VLANs for multicast.
I'm trying to keep it as a
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 7:36 PM, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote:
Paul Querna wrote:
no, this is just a utility module, which tells you where other members
are.
second, mod_backhand has never been ported to 2.x, and it does allow
you to autoconfigure on cloud-enviroments, which mostly
18 matches
Mail list logo
