> Can the backport I tested and suggested on May 13th 2019, about
> mod_session_crypto be considered for this release? Or if it's too late
> for me to ask again, for the next one?
>
I proposed it just now
Le Sat, 3 Aug 2019 08:51:07 -0500,
Daniel Ruggeri a écrit :
> Hi, all;
> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this
> candidate tarball as 2.4.40:
> [ ]
On 8/5/19 8:00 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
> Hi, All;
> As discussed on this list, a minor regression has been detected with a
> fix in flight. I'll go ahead and terminate this release vote and will
> plan to T again in the near future with the fix in place.
>
> Thanks to all who prepped for
Daniel Ruggeri in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Mon, 05 Aug 2019 18:54:18
-0500):
>Thanks, Jan;
> I'm afraid I have no way to verify or dig into Windows-specific
> issues. Can you share more information or errors that can help, or is
> this related to the things already discussed on the list?
There
Hi, All;
As discussed on this list, a minor regression has been detected with a fix
in flight. I'll go ahead and terminate this release vote and will plan to T
again in the near future with the fix in place.
Thanks to all who prepped for testing. Keep those testing rigs warm - we'll be
back
Thanks, Jan;
I'm afraid I have no way to verify or dig into Windows-specific issues. Can
you share more information or errors that can help, or is this related to the
things already discussed on the list?
--
Daniel Ruggeri
On August 4, 2019 6:33:58 AM CDT, Jan Ehrhardt wrote:
>Gregg Smith
The fix is in trunk and I proposed it for backport. Needs 2 votes.
> Am 05.08.2019 um 15:44 schrieb Jan Ehrhardt :
>
> Jim Jagielski in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Mon, 5 Aug 2019 09:15:22
> -0400):
>> I vote -1 due to the known issue w/ building and running mod_md.
>>
>> Yes, it's not a
Jim Jagielski in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Mon, 5 Aug 2019 09:15:22
-0400):
>I vote -1 due to the known issue w/ building and running mod_md.
>
>Yes, it's not a regression, but the fix is easy and version numbers are
>cheap. We should release the best possible version each time.
The fix for the
On 8/5/19 4:04 AM, Joe Orton wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 04, 2019 at 04:51:45PM -0400, Dennis Clarke wrote:
>> Quick reply here to let you know that the build fails instantly
>> within server/config.c at func process_resource_config_cb() with
>> a strange error uttered by Oracle Studio 12.6 thus :
> ...
I vote -1 due to the known issue w/ building and running mod_md.
Yes, it's not a regression, but the fix is easy and version numbers are cheap.
We should release the best possible version each time.
Let's mark 2.4.40 DOA and release 2.4.41 w/ the patch.
> On Aug 3, 2019, at 9:51 AM, Daniel
Runs all fine, no issues seen sofar.
+1
On Saturday 03/08/2019 at 15:51, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
Hi, all;
Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this
Stefan Eissing in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Mon, 5 Aug 2019 11:01:32
+0200):
>I suspect it is the change in mod_ssl interface to the other modules. I
>have to write a test for it.
>
>It used to be that this chain file was ignored in mod_ssl 2.4.39 when it
>retrieved certificates from mod_md. Now
I suspect it is the change in mod_ssl interface to the other modules. I have to
write a test for it.
It used to be that this chain file was ignored in mod_ssl 2.4.39 when it
retrieved certificates from mod_md. Now mod_md adds its certificate via a hook
and the chain file seems to remain in
Stefan Eissing in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Mon, 5 Aug 2019 10:23:27
+0200):
>Trying to sum up what you are saying: mod_md 2.4.40 does not introduce a
>new problem, but testing with it exposed an issue that affects both.
>There is no regression in 2.4.40.
It was not an noticable issue in 2.4.39
Trying to sum up what you are saying: mod_md 2.4.40 does not introduce a new
problem, but testing with it exposed an issue that affects both. There is no
regression in 2.4.40.
As to the problem: the SSLCertificateChainFile directive made mod_ssl fail in
conjunction with mod_md and an empty
Jan Ehrhardt in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Sun, 04 Aug 2019 01:26:27
+0200):
>Maybe some config changes are needed, but then they should be clearly
>documented in the change log. The trouble with this release is that the
>problem with mod_md will only show up when the first certificate has to
>be
On Sun, Aug 04, 2019 at 04:51:45PM -0400, Dennis Clarke wrote:
> Quick reply here to let you know that the build fails instantly
> within server/config.c at func process_resource_config_cb() with
> a strange error uttered by Oracle Studio 12.6 thus :
...
> "config.c", line 1907: error: undefined
What fails and how? What is in the log?
> Am 03.08.2019 um 21:22 schrieb Jan Ehrhardt :
>
> Gregg Smith in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Sat, 3 Aug 2019 08:43:21 -0700):
>> On 8/3/2019 6:51 AM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
>>> Hi, all;
>>>Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
On 8/4/19 4:51 PM, Dennis Clarke wrote:
> On 8/3/19 9:51 AM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
>> Hi, all;
>> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>>
>> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this
>> candidate
On 8/3/19 9:51 AM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
> Hi, all;
> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this
> candidate tarball as 2.4.40:
> [ ] +1: It's not just
Gregg Smith in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Sat, 3 Aug 2019 08:43:21 -0700):
>Opps, looks like the APLOGNO's didn't get filled in. I'm still ok with
>releasing .40 w/o them.
>
>mod_md.c(386): warning C4003: not enough actual parameters for macro
>'APLOGNO'
>mod_md.c(391): warning C4003: not enough
Jan Ehrhardt in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Sat, 03 Aug 2019 21:22:58
+0200):
>Gregg Smith in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Sat, 3 Aug 2019 08:43:21 -0700):
>>On 8/3/2019 6:51 AM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
>>> Hi, all;
>>> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
>>>
Gregg Smith in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Sat, 3 Aug 2019 08:43:21 -0700):
>On 8/3/2019 6:51 AM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
>> Hi, all;
>> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
>[X] +1: It's good enough!
>
>VC14 & 15 x86 &
On 8/3/2019 6:51 AM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
Hi, all;
Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
[X] +1: It's good enough!
VC14 & 15 x86 & x64 w/ makefiles
Opps, looks like the APLOGNO's didn't get filled in. I'm still ok
Hi, all;
Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this
candidate tarball as 2.4.40:
[ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
[ ] +0: Let's have a talk.
[ ] -1:
25 matches
Mail list logo
