I don’t see why a verbiage similar to “Fixed in Apache httpd-2.4.44 (not
released to the public)” couldn’t be used: this is, after all, a true statement.
While it should be common understanding that newer code versions carry
improvements and fixes from previous ones, maybe this should be
Hi, Bill;
I wondered about this myself. I agree that we allow for ambiguity
when we say an issue is fixed in 2.4.44 and 2.4.45 (which weren't
released). Perhaps we should just bump the 'fixed' version up to the
released version... but then we should also add to the 'affected'
versions the
Following the announcement link, it isn't clear that
https://httpd.apache.org/security/vulnerabilities_24.html
fixes issues in 2.4.46.
Should the fixed-in be promoted to the revision of Apache HTTP Server
actually published (released) by the project? It almost reads like "fixed in
2.4.46-dev"
Hi, all;
With 12 binding PMC +1 votes, two additional +1 votes from the
community, and no -1 votes, I'm pleased to report that the vote has
PASSED to release 2.4.46. I will begin the process of pushing to the
distribution mirrors which should enable us for a Friday announcement -
a great way
On Sat, Aug 1, 2020 at 9:13 AM Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
> Hi, all;
>Third time is a charm! Please find below the proposed release tarball
> and signatures:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
Just as a footnote to 2.4.46, as mentioned before mod_lua won't compile
against the
On Sat, Aug 1, 2020 at 9:13 AM Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
> Hi, all;
>Third time is a charm! Please find below the proposed release tarball
> and signatures:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this
> candidate tarball
On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 01:48:08PM +0200, Rainer Jung wrote:
> GDB info (sporadic) Solaris shutdown crashes during OpenSSL shutdown in
> mod_watchdog:
Awesome level of testing as usual, thanks Rainer!
I see similar crashes with mod_watchdog active for 2.4 prefork. I think
the trigger is also
Am 01.08.2020 um 16:13 schrieb Daniel Ruggeri:
Hi, all;
Third time is a charm! Please find below the proposed release tarball
and signatures:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this
candidate tarball as 2.4.46:
[X] +1:
[x] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
[ ] +0: Let's have a talk.
[ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong.
Debian 10 build.
On 8/1/2020 7:13 AM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
Hi, all;
Third time is a charm! Please find below the proposed release tarball
and signatures:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this
candidate tarball as 2.4.46:
[ ] +1:
For my own +1... tested under the following versions:
system:
kernel:
name: Linux
release: 4.19.0-10-amd64
version: #1 SMP Debian 4.19.132-1 (2020-07-24)
machine: x86_64
libraries:
openssl: "1.1.1g"
openldap: "2.4.50"
apr: "1.7.0"
apr-util: "1.6.1"
iconv:
On 8/1/20 4:13 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
> Hi, all;
> Third time is a charm! Please find below the proposed release tarball
> and signatures:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this
> candidate tarball as 2.4.46:
>
On Sat, Aug 1, 2020 at 10:14 AM Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
>
> Hi, all;
>Third time is a charm! Please find below the proposed release tarball
> and signatures:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this
> candidate
On Sat, Aug 1, 2020 at 4:14 PM Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this
> candidate tarball as 2.4.46:
[X] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
All good in my testing, thanks Daniel for RMing.
On 01/08/2020 16:13, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
[X] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
Passed on fedroa32 x86_64.
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
On Sat, Aug 01, 2020 at 09:13:29AM -0500, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
> Hi, all;
> Third time is a charm! Please find below the proposed release tarball
> and signatures:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this
>
On Sat, Aug 1, 2020 at 4:14 PM Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
>
> Hi, all;
>Third time is a charm! Please find below the proposed release tarball
> and signatures:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this
> candidate tarball
On 02/08/2020 00:13, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
> Hi, all;
> Third time is a charm! Please find below the proposed release tarball
> and signatures:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this
> candidate tarball as 2.4.46:
>
WIN32 APR 1.7.0 APR-UTIL 1.6.1 with Analyses
Warning C6386 \apr\time\win32\timestr.c 189 Buffer overrun while
writing to 'new_format': the writable size is 'max+11' bytes, but 'j' bytes
might be written.
Warning C26451 \apr\time\win32\time.c 239 Arithmetic overflow: Using
Le 01/08/2020 à 16:13, Daniel Ruggeri a écrit :
Hi, all;
Third time is a charm! Please find below the proposed release tarball
and signatures:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this
candidate tarball as 2.4.46:
[X]
Date in announcement is still :
September 21, 2018
> Op 1 aug. 2020 om 16:13 heeft Daniel Ruggeri het
> volgende geschreven:
>
> Hi, all;
>Third time is a charm! Please find below the proposed release tarball
> and signatures:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would
Hi, all;
Third time is a charm! Please find below the proposed release tarball
and signatures:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this
candidate tarball as 2.4.46:
[ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
[ ] +0:
22 matches
Mail list logo
