Re: 2.0.38-39 lockup problem ?

2002-06-21 Thread Greg Ames
Paul J. Reder wrote: This looks exactly like the problem that Allan and I ran into when you tried to send a request to http://foo.bar.org:443 (i.e. insecure request over the secure port). It tried to generate an error and went into an infinte loop. Can you try that with current HEAD and

RE: 2.0.38-39 lockup problem ?

2002-06-21 Thread Ryan Bloom
From: gregames [mailto:gregames] On Behalf Of Greg Ames Paul J. Reder wrote: This looks exactly like the problem that Allan and I ran into when you tried to send a request to http://foo.bar.org:443 (i.e. insecure request over the secure port). It tried to generate an error and went

Re: 2.0.38-39 lockup problem ?

2002-06-21 Thread Paul J. Reder
Sorry, didn't mean to sow seeds of confusion, that problem was fixed by an SSL specific fix (as Ryan mentioned). The backtrace just looked really familiar, and the scenario sounded very close. I was just wondering if there were a higher level problem that was being tickled in different ways. I

Re: 2.0.38-39 lockup problem ?

2002-06-20 Thread Greg Ames
Colm MacCárthaigh wrote: also; anyone looking to replicate, I can produce it from a vanilla install by adding: RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST}!monkey$[NC] RewriteRule ^(.+)$ banana at the bottom of the standard httpd.conf , a request with a host header anything

Re: 2.0.38-39 lockup problem ?

2002-06-20 Thread Paul J. Reder
This looks exactly like the problem that Allan and I ran into when you tried to send a request to http://foo.bar.org:443 (i.e. insecure request over the secure port). It tried to generate an error and went into an infinte loop. That special case was fixed by removing the SSL request handler from

2.0.38-39 lockup problem ?

2002-06-19 Thread Colm MacCárthaigh
I havnt tracked down a cause yet, but this happens with the 2.0.38 tarball, the 2.0.39 one, and the current HEAD. I'm running Solaris 2.8 on sparc, colmmacc@prodigy (~) $ uname -a SunOS prodigy 5.8 Generic_108528-13 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-4 it's a nice and beefy E450. I was running 2.0.36

Re: 2.0.38-39 lockup problem ?

2002-06-19 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On Wed, Jun 19, 2002 at 09:26:46AM +0100, Colm MacCárthaigh wrote: I havnt tracked down a cause yet, but this happens with the 2.0.38 tarball, the 2.0.39 one, and the current HEAD. I'm running Solaris 2.8 on sparc, If you can, please run pstack on the running processes and report back

Re: 2.0.38-39 lockup problem ?

2002-06-19 Thread Colm MacCárthaigh
On Wed, Jun 19, 2002 at 01:32:00AM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: On Wed, Jun 19, 2002 at 09:26:46AM +0100, Colm MacCárthaigh wrote: I havnt tracked down a cause yet, but this happens with the 2.0.38 tarball, the 2.0.39 one, and the current HEAD. I'm running Solaris 2.8 on sparc,