On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 1:32 PM, Jacob Champion wrote:
> On 12/29/2016 08:16 PM, David Zuelke wrote:
>>
>> The tl;dr of this approach is that
>>
>> - any x.y.z release only introduces bugfixes. These releases are done
>> every four weeks, like clockwork. If a fix doesn't make
On 12/29/2016 08:16 PM, David Zuelke wrote:
The tl;dr of this approach is that
- any x.y.z release only introduces bugfixes. These releases are done
every four weeks, like clockwork. If a fix doesn't make the cut for a
release, it'll end up in the next one; - x.y.0 releases, on the other
hand,
On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 11:16 PM, David Zuelke wrote:
> As a, more or less, "outside observer", I happen to think that the current
> method of voting on finals, instead of a practice of rolling out RCs (that
> are then left up for testing for at least a week), is fundamentally
Hi everyone,
Given the several current threads where there's arguing about what and how and
when to release features, backported or not, I'd like to offer a tale of a
project that was, more or less, in the same dire spot, and pulled itself out of
that misery with great success and universal