Re: APLOGNO in 2.2 backports

2016-12-22 Thread William A Rowe Jr
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 9:33 AM, Eric Covener wrote: > Should we have something like this in 2.2: > > #define APLOGNO(s) "" > > So subsequent backports don't need manual merging when the context has > a message ID in it? > IMO, no. Because if you are applying it as a patch

APLOGNO in 2.2 backports

2016-12-22 Thread Eric Covener
Should we have something like this in 2.2: #define APLOGNO(s) "" So subsequent backports don't need manual merging when the context has a message ID in it? -- Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com