On 02/03/2021 16:07, Yann Ylavic wrote:
On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 3:44 PM jean-frederic clere wrote:
On 02/03/2021 12:35, Yann Ylavic wrote:
On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 11:05 AM jean-frederic clere wrote:
Has anyone something against making the above creating a balancer that
can be used later by
On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 3:44 PM jean-frederic clere wrote:
>
> On 02/03/2021 12:35, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 11:05 AM jean-frederic clere
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Has anyone something against making the above creating a balancer that
> >> can be used later by the
On 02/03/2021 12:35, Yann Ylavic wrote:
On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 11:05 AM jean-frederic clere wrote:
Has anyone something against making the above creating a balancer that
can be used later by the balancer-manager handler to create the
corresponding workers and a customized load_balancer
On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 11:05 AM jean-frederic clere wrote:
>
> Has anyone something against making the above creating a balancer that
> can be used later by the balancer-manager handler to create the
> corresponding workers and a customized load_balancer provider to replace
> the ProxyPass logic?
Hi,
The following in httpd.conf:
+++
+++
does nothing in a configuration, not even a warning ;-)
Has anyone something against making the above creating a balancer that
can be used later by the balancer-manager handler to create the
corresponding workers and a customized load_balancer
