The 2.4.x httpd branch was created from the r1200449 point of
trunk… I've tried to backport pretty much all non-apreq patches
from trunk.
On 11.11.2011 09:42, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The 2.4.x httpd branch was created from the r1200449 point of
trunk… I've tried to backport pretty much all non-apreq patches
from trunk.
I guess we are still on CTR on that branch?
Rainer
On 11/11/2011 1:27 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 11.11.2011 09:42, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The 2.4.x httpd branch was created from the r1200449 point of
trunk… I've tried to backport pretty much all non-apreq patches
from trunk.
I guess we are still on CTR on that branch?
Absolutely until 2.4.0 is
Jim++
Is there a consensus to do the apreq - apr/perl/httpd split? IIRC,
last time it came up, there were objections...
Issac
On 11/11/2011 09:42, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The 2.4.x httpd branch was created from the r1200449 point of
trunk… I've tried to backport pretty much all non-apreq
On Nov 11, 2011, at 11:27 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 11.11.2011 09:42, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The 2.4.x httpd branch was created from the r1200449 point of
trunk… I've tried to backport pretty much all non-apreq patches
from trunk.
I guess we are still on CTR on that branch?
Yep.
On Nov 11, 2011, at 9:42 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The 2.4.x httpd branch was created from the r1200449 point of
trunk… I've tried to backport pretty much all non-apreq patches
from trunk.
I have added version 2.4-HEAD to Bugzilla.
As well as 2.3.15-beta...
S.
--
scte...@apache.org
