I don't think there's much interest in merging any of the patches that
are currently in the STATUS, so I'm intending to a roll a 1.3.x
release Friday for testing/voting. With a release next week.
Unfortunately testing 1.3.x is more painful than it used to be, and so
far I haven't managed to get
Colm MacCárthaigh wrote:
I don't think there's much interest in merging any of the patches that
are currently in the STATUS, so I'm intending to a roll a 1.3.x
release Friday for testing/voting. With a release next week.
Unfortunately testing 1.3.x is more painful than it used to be, and so
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 11:28 AM, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote:
It sounds to me like it may be a bit of a pandora's box making another
release. Is it not possible to just make a patch available?
It sure is a PITA, but I think it would be more professional to get a
final release out
On 06.01.2010 12:18, Colm MacCárthaigh wrote:
I don't think there's much interest in merging any of the patches that
are currently in the STATUS, so I'm intending to a roll a 1.3.x
release Friday for testing/voting. With a release next week.
Unfortunately testing 1.3.x is more painful than it
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 12:20 PM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
So there's only one source update and the update of the mime.types. Is that
worth a release?
There's a pending security fix too that will be committed before the roll.
--
Colm
Let me know if you need any help :)
On Jan 6, 2010, at 6:18 AM, Colm MacCárthaigh wrote:
I don't think there's much interest in merging any of the patches that
are currently in the STATUS, so I'm intending to a roll a 1.3.x
release Friday for testing/voting. With a release next week.
