Re: Include conf.d/*.conf patch from redhat

2002-09-12 Thread Ian Holsman
On Tue, 10 Sep 2002 22:56:12 -0700, Joe Orton wrote: On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 09:21:17PM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 04:04:31PM -0700, Ian Holsman wrote: does anyone recall if there was a good reason not to include this patch in the main distribution ? What

Re: Include conf.d/*.conf patch from redhat

2002-09-11 Thread Brian Pane
Joe Orton wrote: On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 09:21:17PM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 04:04:31PM -0700, Ian Holsman wrote: does anyone recall if there was a good reason not to include this patch in the main distribution ? What patch is this? -- justin

Include conf.d/*.conf patch from redhat

2002-09-10 Thread Ian Holsman
does anyone recall if there was a good reason not to include this patch in the main distribution ?

Re: Include conf.d/*.conf patch from redhat

2002-09-10 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 04:04:31PM -0700, Ian Holsman wrote: does anyone recall if there was a good reason not to include this patch in the main distribution ? What patch is this? -- justin

Re: Include conf.d/*.conf patch from redhat

2002-09-10 Thread Joe Orton
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 09:21:17PM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 04:04:31PM -0700, Ian Holsman wrote: does anyone recall if there was a good reason not to include this patch in the main distribution ? What patch is this? -- justin I hadn't had time to submit