Re: 2.0.49 rolled

2004-03-31 Thread Stas Bekman
Stas Bekman wrote: Sander Temme wrote: On Mar 18, 2004, at 12:21 AM, Sander Striker wrote: I've put the 2.0.49 tarballs up at: I'm not entirely happy about IPv6/IPv4 behaviour on at least FreeBSD 5.2.1 and MacOSX 10.3.{2,3}, possibly others. I'm seeing the following when running the

Re: 2.0.49 rolled

2004-03-25 Thread Stas Bekman
Sander Temme wrote: On Mar 18, 2004, at 12:21 AM, Sander Striker wrote: I've put the 2.0.49 tarballs up at: I'm not entirely happy about IPv6/IPv4 behaviour on at least FreeBSD 5.2.1 and MacOSX 10.3.{2,3}, possibly others. I'm seeing the following when running the perl-framework. All three

Re: 2.0.49 rolled

2004-03-25 Thread Juanma Barranquero
On Wed, 24 Mar 2004 15:49:13 -0800, Mathihalli, Madhusudan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please apply the patch posted by Joe to ssl_engine_io.c. The problem should go away ! Yes, it does. Thanks! /L/e/k/t/u

Re: 2.0.49 rolled

2004-03-24 Thread Sander Temme
On Mar 18, 2004, at 12:21 AM, Sander Striker wrote: I've put the 2.0.49 tarballs up at: I'm not entirely happy about IPv6/IPv4 behaviour on at least FreeBSD 5.2.1 and MacOSX 10.3.{2,3}, possibly others. I'm seeing the following when running the perl-framework. All three boxes have IPv6

Re: 2.0.49 rolled

2004-03-24 Thread Juanma Barranquero
On Thu, 18 Mar 2004 20:18:37 -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You built from scratch - can you give us a backtrace according to VisualStudio or Dr Watson? Sure enough: allocator_free(apr_allocator_t * allocator=0xffec, apr_memnode_t * node=0x) Line 327 + 0x6

RE: 2.0.49 rolled

2004-03-24 Thread Mathihalli, Madhusudan
Please apply the patch posted by Joe to ssl_engine_io.c. The problem should go away ! -Madhu -Original Message- From: Juanma Barranquero [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 19, 2004 5:51 AM To: William A. Rowe, Jr.; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 2.0.49 rolled On Thu, 18 Mar

RE: 2.0.49 rolled - win32 binaries online

2004-03-19 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 01:42 PM 3/18/2004, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Win32 dos line-ended/vc5 makefiles/apr-iconv flavor of the *sources* is now at http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/httpd-2.0.49-win32-src.zip Win32 builders please test. Binaries to follow. are now up on

Re: 2.0.49 rolled

2004-03-19 Thread Juanma Barranquero
[resent] On Thu, 18 Mar 2004 20:18:37 -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You built from scratch - can you give us a backtrace according to VisualStudio or Dr Watson? Sure enough: allocator_free(apr_allocator_t * allocator=0xffec, apr_memnode_t * node=0x) Line

Re: 2.0.49 rolled

2004-03-19 Thread Sander Temme
On Mar 18, 2004, at 12:21 AM, Sander Striker wrote: I've put the 2.0.49 tarballs up at: I'm not entirely happy about IPv6/IPv4 behaviour on at least FreeBSD 5.2.1 and MacOSX 10.3.{2,3}, possibly others. I'm seeing the following when running the perl-framework. All three boxes have IPv6

Re: 2.0.49 rolled

2004-03-19 Thread Paul Querna
On Fri, 2004-03-19 at 08:16, Sander Temme wrote: On the BSD box, when I switch the localhost lines so that IPv4 (127.0.0.1) comes before IPv6 (::1), and re-run the tests, I see the server (using netstat) bind to only IPv4. Tests succeed. This sounds like a --disable-v4-mapped issue.

Re: 2.0.49 rolled..piped logs

2004-03-19 Thread Bastiaan van der Put
Hi, piped log program '/usr/local/apache2/bin/logresolve /home/bassie/logs/access_log' failed unexpectedly Bug still thereusing this patch solves it again. --- server/log.c14 Jul 2003 14:48:40 - 1.135 +++ server/log.c1 Nov 2003 15:13:35 - @@ -743,6 +743,8 @@

Re: 2.0.49 rolled

2004-03-18 Thread Jeff Trawick
Sander Striker wrote: And a big Thank You to all the testers and developers for helping out. Thanks as always to you Sander for taking care of this!!!

Re: 2.0.49 rolled

2004-03-18 Thread Andre Breiler
Hi, On Thu, 18 Mar 2004, Sander Striker wrote: I've put the 2.0.49 tarballs up at: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist It compiles and seems to work (SunOS 5.8 sparc). Just a minor side note that it still has #define AP_SERVER_PATCHLEVEL 49-dev in. And a big Thank You to all the testers

RE: 2.0.49 rolled

2004-03-18 Thread Sander Striker
From: Andre Breiler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 12:41 PM Hi, On Thu, 18 Mar 2004, Sander Striker wrote: I've put the 2.0.49 tarballs up at: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist It compiles and seems to work (SunOS 5.8 sparc). Just a minor side note

RE: 2.0.49 rolled

2004-03-18 Thread Sander Striker
On Thu, 2004-03-18 at 13:16, Sander Striker wrote: From: Andre Breiler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 12:41 PM Hi, On Thu, 18 Mar 2004, Sander Striker wrote: I've put the 2.0.49 tarballs up at: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist It compiles

Re: 2.0.49 rolled

2004-03-18 Thread Bob MacMunn
2004 Subject: RE: 2.0.49 rolled On Thu, 2004-03-18 at 13:16, Sander Striker wrote: From: Andre Breiler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 12:41 PM Hi, On Thu, 18 Mar 2004, Sander Striker wrote: I've put the 2.0.49 tarballs up at: http

RE: 2.0.49 rolled

2004-03-18 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Win32 dos line-ended/vc5 makefiles/apr-iconv flavor of the *sources* is now at http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/httpd-2.0.49-win32-src.zip Win32 builders please test. Binaries to follow. Bill At 06:39 AM 3/18/2004, Sander Striker wrote: I've put the 2.0.49 tarballs up at:

Re: 2.0.49 rolled

2004-03-18 Thread Sascha Kersken
Win32 dos line-ended/vc5 makefiles/apr-iconv flavor of the *sources* is now at http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/httpd-2.0.49-win32-src.zip Win32 builders please test. Binaries to follow. It builds and runs fine on Win2K using Visual Studio .NET 2002. Regards Sascha

Re: 2.0.49 rolled

2004-03-18 Thread Juanma Barranquero
On Fri, 19 Mar 2004 00:01:23 +0100, Sascha Kersken [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It builds and runs fine on Win2K using Visual Studio .NET 2002. lurking mode=off I've built 2.0.49: - on Windows XP Professional (Spanish Edition) - with Visual Studio .NET 2003 - with OpenSSL 0.9.7d - with Zlib

Re: 2.0.49 rolled

2004-03-18 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 06:16 PM 3/18/2004, Juanma Barranquero wrote: On Fri, 19 Mar 2004 00:01:23 +0100, Sascha Kersken [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It builds and runs fine on Win2K using Visual Studio .NET 2002. lurking mode=off I've built 2.0.49: - on Windows XP Professional (Spanish Edition) - with Visual