On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 07:16:02AM +, Joe Orton wrote:
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 11:38:06PM +, Colm MacCárthaigh wrote:
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 11:05:21PM +, Joe Orton wrote:
Colm, can you try running the apr/test/sendfile binary with your
machines?
It was one of the first
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 10:54:53AM +, Colm MacCárthaigh wrote:
..
telnet [v6addr] 80
GET / HTTP/1.1
Host: madeup.tld
observe lack of response
Have you verified with tcpdump/ethereal etc that this hang is because
the server is not sending the packets? What does netstat -t show for
this
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 11:30:29AM +, Joe Orton wrote:
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 10:54:53AM +, Colm MacCárthaigh wrote:
..
telnet [v6addr] 80
GET / HTTP/1.1
Host: madeup.tld
observe lack of response
Have you verified with tcpdump/ethereal etc that this hang is because
the
Colm MacCárthaigh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 12:58:48PM +, Colm MacCárthaigh wrote:
I'm using vanilla 2.4.18, from Debian kernel-source-2.4.18
, one machine
has the broadcom bcm5700 module, and the the other has the intel
e1000 module.
O.k., more
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 04:17:53PM +, Joe Orton wrote:
To summarize some off-list dicussion - the kernel guys have said that
using sendfile on IPv6 sockets may trigger bugs in cards which do
hardware TCP checksumming for card/driver/OS combinations which support
that. (since the cards have
On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 11:33:27PM +0100, Jeroen Massar wrote:
Colm MacCarthaigh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 02:48:53PM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Colm MacCarthaigh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Linux (2.4.18 and 2.4.19, for me anyway) with apache versions
Colm MacCárthaigh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
O.k., now that is interesting, another thing I've noticed is that when
the encoding is chunked, I can't replicate the problem. Presumably the
problem is related to how much data is trying to be sent down the
socket at once.
Well, note that Apache
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 07:12:04AM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Colm MacCárthaigh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
O.k., now that is interesting, another thing I've noticed is that when
the encoding is chunked, I can't replicate the problem. Presumably the
problem is related to how much data is
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 12:25:49PM +, Colm MacCárthaigh wrote:
My tests (and patch) were based on apr and apr-util from CVS ,
with the 2.0.43 codebase, because CVS seems broken right now.
stupid pre-test patch, here's the real one:
Index: configure.in
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 12:30 PM
Subject: Re: Linux + TCP_CORK + IPv6 = Broken [PATCH]
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 12:25:49PM +, Colm MacCárthaigh wrote:
My tests (and patch) were based on apr and apr-util from CVS ,
with the 2.0.43 codebase
Colm MacCárthaigh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 12:25:49PM +, Colm MacCárthaigh wrote:
My tests (and patch) were based on apr and apr-util from CVS ,
with the 2.0.43 codebase, because CVS seems broken right now.
stupid pre-test patch, here's the real one:
patch
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 08:21:36AM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Colm MacCárthaigh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 12:25:49PM +, Colm MacCárthaigh wrote:
My tests (and patch) were based on apr and apr-util from CVS ,
with the 2.0.43 codebase, because CVS seems broken
At 07:18 AM 12/4/2002, Colm MacCárthaigh wrote:
In the interest of tying up loose ends, I'm still concerned with your
observation that --disable-sendfile didn't do the right thing... did
you make distclean before re-configuring?
The problem there was that --disable-sendfile isnt an option
In the interest of tying up loose ends, I'm still concerned with your
observation that --disable-sendfile didn't do the right thing... did
you make distclean before re-configuring?
The problem there was that --disable-sendfile isnt an option configure
knows anything about, the right one
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 02:29:29PM -, David Reid wrote:
In the interest of tying up loose ends, I'm still concerned with your
observation that --disable-sendfile didn't do the right thing... did
you make distclean before re-configuring?
The problem there was that
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 02:29:29PM -, David Reid wrote:
In the interest of tying up loose ends, I'm still concerned with
your
observation that --disable-sendfile didn't do the right thing...
did
you make distclean before re-configuring?
The problem there was that
Colm MacCárthaigh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
as David Reid reminded, the flag needs to default to 0 on the right
Linux boxen... unless/until we get specific info, I plan to tweak
your patch to default it to --disable when building on Linux 2.4.x...
relatively few users who would encounter
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 08:21:36AM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Colm MacCárthaigh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 12:25:49PM +, Colm MacCárthaigh wrote:
My tests (and patch) were based on apr and apr-util from CVS ,
with the 2.0.43 codebase, because CVS seems broken
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 11:05:21PM +, Joe Orton wrote:
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 08:21:36AM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Colm MacCárthaigh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 12:25:49PM +, Colm MacCárthaigh wrote:
My tests (and patch) were based on apr and apr-util
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 11:38:06PM +, Colm MacCárthaigh wrote:
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 11:05:21PM +, Joe Orton wrote:
Colm, can you try running the apr/test/sendfile binary with your
machines?
It was one of the first things I tried when I was debugging,
unfortunately, it doesnt
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 02:48:53PM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Colm MacCarthaigh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Linux (2.4.18 and 2.4.19, for me anyway) with apache versions
2.0.40 to 2.0.43 (that I've tested anyways) is broken with
TCP_CORK and IPv6. Bizarrely v6 requests will work the first
Colm MacCarthaigh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 02:48:53PM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Colm MacCarthaigh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Linux (2.4.18 and 2.4.19, for me anyway) with apache versions
2.0.40 to 2.0.43 (that I've tested anyways) is broken with
Linux (2.4.18 and 2.4.19, for me anyway) with apache versions
2.0.40 to 2.0.43 (that I've tested anyways) is broken with
TCP_CORK and IPv6. Bizarrely v6 requests will work the first
few times and then start failing, typically you just wont get
a response from the server. Though strace shows
Humm... should we have a runtime check instead? Folks might want to use the
same executable for both ipv4 and ipv6 traffic.
Bill
Linux (2.4.18 and 2.4.19, for me anyway) with apache versions
2.0.40 to 2.0.43 (that I've tested anyways) is broken with
TCP_CORK and IPv6. Bizarrely v6
Colm MacCarthaigh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Linux (2.4.18 and 2.4.19, for me anyway) with apache versions
2.0.40 to 2.0.43 (that I've tested anyways) is broken with
TCP_CORK and IPv6. Bizarrely v6 requests will work the first
few times and then start failing, typically you just wont get
a
25 matches
Mail list logo
