On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 10:29:54AM +0200, Graham Leggett wrote:
The idea of canonicalising the name is sound, but munging them into an
added :80 and an added ? is really ugly - these are not the kind of URLs
that an end user would understand at a glance if they had to see them
listed.
An
On Aug 15, 2005, at 4:10 AM, Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 10:29:54AM +0200, Graham Leggett wrote:
The idea of canonicalising the name is sound, but munging them
into an
added :80 and an added ? is really ugly - these are not the kind
of URLs
that an end user would
Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
An end-user should never see these keys, the only place they are visible
to any user is the semi-binary mod_disk_cache files. An administrator
would have to really know what they're doing to find them, or be using
htcacheadmin - once I finish that, and if it gets
Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
Currently;
GET / HTTP/1.1
Host: ftp.heanet.ie
GET http://ftp.heanet.ie/ HTTP/1.0
GET HTTP://Ftp.Heanet.Ie/ HTTP/1.0
are all mapped to different hashes by mod_cache; despite being the same
content, this is an inefficient waste of disk
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 01:34:50PM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Here's a more involved patch that gets the logic right. It's 6pm on a
Friday for me, so I have only tested it a little, but thought I'd
share
for comment before the weekend.
+1 on inspection... testing to be done over
the
Should this honor usecanonicalname? If so, could just use
ap_get_servername(r) in stead of r-hostname. This may further compact
the number of entries.
--
Brian Akins
Lead Systems Engineer
CNN Internet Technologies
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 11:54:44AM -0400, Brian Akins wrote:
Should this honor usecanonicalname? If so, could just use
ap_get_servername(r) in stead of r-hostname. This may further compact
the number of entries.
Yes, but I think there'd have to be additional code to detect the proxy
cases.
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 04:59:20PM +0100, Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 11:54:44AM -0400, Brian Akins wrote:
Should this honor usecanonicalname? If so, could just use
ap_get_servername(r) in stead of r-hostname. This may further compact
the number of entries.
Yes,
On Aug 12, 2005, at 1:10 PM, Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 04:59:20PM +0100, Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 11:54:44AM -0400, Brian Akins wrote:
Should this honor usecanonicalname? If so, could just use
ap_get_servername(r) in stead of r-hostname.
