There's just 1 more backport left in the list, and its missing
just 1 more +1...
On Mar 14, 2012, at 3:36 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
In the attempts to keep the momentum going, I'd like to push for
a httpd 2.4.2 release Real Soon Now.
- Original Message -
There's just 1 more backport left in the list, and its missing
just 1 more +1...
Done
On Mar 14, 2012, at 3:36 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
In the attempts to keep the momentum going, I'd like to push for
a httpd 2.4.2 release Real Soon Now.
--
Igor Galić
Thx!
And applied!
On Apr 3, 2012, at 9:14 AM, Igor Galić wrote:
- Original Message -
There's just 1 more backport left in the list, and its missing
just 1 more +1...
Done
On Mar 14, 2012, at 3:36 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
In the attempts to keep the momentum going, I'd
On 31 Mar 2012, at 3:10 AM, Gregg Smith wrote:
I found this to be an interesting error message:
[Fri Mar 30 18:07:41.019600 2012] [session_crypto:error] [pid 4236:tid 700]
(15)Error string not specified yet: AH01845: (null)
very informative :)
Can you give more details of the crypto
FYI: needs to be built separately -- httpd-2.4.2 (patched for AIX) builds
and passes configtest on AIX 4.3.3
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote:
On 31 Mar 2012, at 3:10 AM, Gregg Smith wrote:
I found this to be an interesting error message:
[Fri Mar 30
Hi Graham,
I know I should have elaborated more but I was very short on time at
that moment. It was a missing dependency.
It was nss and I was pulling away nss dll files to see just what was
needed and what wasn't. Interesting was that the error was different for
most but that error came up
With the code:
if (APR_SUCCESS != rv err) {
ap_log_error(APLOG_MARK, APLOG_ERR, rv, s, APLOGNO(01845)
%s, err-msg);
return rv;
}
then 01845 gets associated with lots of different crypto driver messages.
How about logging something like
On 31 Mar 2012, at 7:25 PM, Gregg Smith wrote:
It was nss and I was pulling away nss dll files to see just what was needed
and what wasn't. Interesting was that the error was different for most but
that error came up for some. The other was
[Fri Mar 30 18:12:05.018600 2012]
On 3/31/2012 12:44 PM, Graham Leggett wrote:
On 31 Mar 2012, at 7:25 PM, Gregg Smith wrote:
It was nss and I was pulling away nss dll files to see just what was needed and
what wasn't. Interesting was that the error was different for most but that
error came up for some. The other was
[Fri
p.s. just checked the apr-util-2.5.x/xml/expat/README - and it is the same
README file.
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 9:52 PM, Michael Felt mamf...@gmail.com wrote:
Looking for expat I see both in svn for apr-util as well as in the tarball
released for public viewing to following info in the
You can choose whatever external expat you like when you configure apr-util.
OK. Thanks.
I was curious - so I tried to build 2.4.2 on AIX 4.3.3 (still use that
version of AIX to host http://rootvg.net - I do not own it, just help) but
ran into a problem.
apr/apr-util 1.5.0 compiled and installed fine, as did pcre (8.30 I
believe). However, have a problem in the support
I was curious - so I tried to build 2.4.2 on AIX 4.3.3 (still use that
version of AIX to host http://rootvg.net - I do not own it, just help) but
ran into a problem.
There is not yet a 2.4.2, and your issue is probably best served by
creating a dedicated thread rather than using this one
it is just 2.4.2 on aix 4.3.3 - not real important I expect. Worthy of a
mention at least.
No to find where this routine is defined. Try again with apr-1.4.x then,
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 9:06 PM, Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com wrote:
I was curious - so I tried to build 2.4.2 on AIX 4.3.3
I found this to be an interesting error message:
[Fri Mar 30 18:07:41.019600 2012] [session_crypto:error] [pid 4236:tid
700] (15)Error string not specified yet: AH01845: (null)
very informative :)
Gregg
On 25 Mar 2012, at 7:09 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
How does the week of April 2nd sound? This should provide enough time
for the proposed backports to get enough votes and to propose
the backports based on recent trunk improvements...
Sound like a plan? I volunteer to RM.
Quick reminder that
Looking for expat I see both in svn for apr-util as well as in the tarball
released for public viewing to following info in the
projectname/xml/expat/README file:
Expat, Release 1.95.7
This is Expat, a C library for parsing XML, written by James Clark.
Expat is a
Thank you for the compliment. Quite correct I am getting used to svn and
where all of you are.
For the record, I was able to package the httpd-2.4.x using the apr-1.4.6
package generally available together with the apr-util-1.4.2 tarball in
Tarballs/zipballs are at
A new expat 2.1.0 is available, like to see it also included in apr and test
with 2.4.2.
Bill was waiting for it:
From: William A. Rowe Jr.
Date: 2012-03-08 20:27:25
Nor am I (aware of issues), however expat 2.0.1 has vulnerabilites which
are corrected in the expat project's svn but
On 3/27/2012 7:22 AM, Steffen wrote:
A new expat 2.1.0 is available, like to see it also included in apr and test
with 2.4.2.
Excellent news! Of course OpenSSL 1.0.1 has since been released. I'm likely
to get to a quick test build Thursday, so that if there is breakage we can do
something
On 3/25/2012 5:18 PM, Michael Felt wrote:
I have been trying to build trunk from trunk versions of apr and apr-util.
buildconf
complains about not being able to find APR-util (or apr-UTIL). In any case,
caps are
involved. Windows might not complain, but UNIX does.
You make no sense. The
How does the week of April 2nd sound? This should provide enough time
for the proposed backports to get enough votes and to propose
the backports based on recent trunk improvements...
Sound like a plan? I volunteer to RM.
On Mar 14, 2012, at 3:36 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
In the attempts to
On 25.03.2012 19:09, Jim Jagielski wrote:
How does the week of April 2nd sound? This should provide enough time
for the proposed backports to get enough votes and to propose
the backports based on recent trunk improvements...
Sound like a plan? I volunteer to RM.
On Mar 14, 2012, at 3:36 PM,
On 25 Mar 2012, at 7:09 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
How does the week of April 2nd sound? This should provide enough time
for the proposed backports to get enough votes and to propose
the backports based on recent trunk improvements...
Sound like a plan? I volunteer to RM.
+1.
I've just
I have been trying to build trunk from trunk versions of apr and
apr-util. buildconf complains about not being able to find APR-util (or
apr-UTIL). In any case, caps are involved. Windows might not complain, but
UNIX does.
To test what you are testing - should I use apr and apr-util trunks, or is
On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 6:18 PM, Michael Felt mamf...@gmail.com wrote:
I have been trying to build trunk from trunk versions of apr and apr-util.
buildconf complains about not being able to find APR-util (or apr-UTIL). In
any case, caps are involved. Windows might not complain, but UNIX does.
On 26 Mar 2012, at 12:18 AM, Michael Felt wrote:
I have been trying to build trunk from trunk versions of apr and apr-util.
buildconf complains about not being able to find APR-util (or apr-UTIL). In
any case, caps are involved. Windows might not complain, but UNIX does.
In theory, you
On 15/03/2012 07:29, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 3/14/2012 2:36 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
In the attempts to keep the momentum going, I'd like to push for
a httpd 2.4.2 release Real Soon Now.
Then this afternoon I'll propose a 'really small patch' around
'the win32 issue' and ask folks who
On 15/03/2012 07:29, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 3/14/2012 2:36 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
In the attempts to keep the momentum going, I'd like to push for
a httpd 2.4.2 release Real Soon Now.
Then this afternoon I'll propose a 'really small patch' around
'the win32 issue' and ask folks who
On 3/15/2012 4:07 AM, Issac Goldstand wrote:
Any chance you can elaborate on It appears MSDN documentation was not
our friend... etc?
From MSDN and my understanding of the new wait-on-event API, it appeared
that MSDN suggested these would be defaults and we would have to adjust
for apr's
Bill,
Us Windows folk would be ecstatic! It is affecting a few noisy users,
then there's the silent masses :)
Not sure what APR quirks, refresh my memory.
I'm +1 for a APU 1.4.2 also, crypto not building for static lib throws a
decent sized monkey wrench into the httpd build. Then maybe we
Gregg, I believe these overrides are either not needed at all, or are
not needed in specific cases, and have yet to determine which is the
case that the users are experiencing.
Is anyone complaining about AcceptFilter data or connection? If not,
then these lines of code simply need to be dodged
On 15 Mar 2012, at 1:06 PM, Gregg Smith wrote:
Us Windows folk would be ecstatic! It is affecting a few noisy users, then
there's the silent masses :)
Not sure what APR quirks, refresh my memory.
I'm +1 for a APU 1.4.2 also, crypto not building for static lib throws a
decent sized monkey
On Mar 15, 2012, at 7:06 AM, Gregg Smith wrote:
Bill,
Us Windows folk would be ecstatic! It is affecting a few noisy users, then
there's the silent masses :)
Not sure what APR quirks, refresh my memory.
I'm +1 for a APU 1.4.2 also, crypto not building for static lib throws a
decent
Bill, not that pages are not showing up, the only problem with
AcceptFilter data has been the AcceptEx error/becoming unresponsive. I
admit to never suggesting trying AcceptFilter connect. Of course, the
problem is on the https side so I never tell them to go to none for
https.
I leave mine
Graham,
Current APU 1.4 head builds fine.
It looks like your fix for this is the only thing in changes.
On 3/15/2012 4:13 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
On 15 Mar 2012, at 1:06 PM, Gregg Smith wrote:
Us Windows folk would be ecstatic! It is affecting a few noisy users, then
there's the silent
On 3/14/2012 2:36 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
In the attempts to keep the momentum going, I'd like to push for
a httpd 2.4.2 release Real Soon Now.
Then this afternoon I'll propose a 'really small patch' around
'the win32 issue' and ask folks who have had problems, and those who
have not, to test
37 matches
Mail list logo
