On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 12:21:58PM -0500, Edward Rudd wrote:
From reading the bug report, it seems that there was one objection to the
patch, in that it adds a new keyword, and the preference was to extend the
existing AllowOverride keyword. So the next step should be to update the
patch to
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 05:13:45PM +0200, Sander Striker wrote:
From: Andre Schild [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
As there are no other problem reportts, it's time to tag RC3 ?
Correct.
Can you pull in the latest apr_file_info.h from the 0.9 branch when you
retag to pick up the
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Refer to http://www.apache.org/dev/apply-license.html --- especially;
To apply the ALv2 to a new software distribution, include one copy of
the license text by copying the file:
I didi take it, and now it compiles fine under win 2000.
The server runs well under win2000 and nt 4.0 server.
As there are no other problem reportts, it's time to tag RC3 ?
André
aarboard ag
internet - networks - screenprint design - multimedia
Egliweg 10 - Postfach 214 - CH-2560 Nidau
From: Andre Schild [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2004 4:53 PM
[...]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 23.06.2004 21:13:10
I just commited a fix for this.
Bill
[...]
I didi take it, and now it compiles fine under win 2000.
The server runs well under win2000 and nt 4.0 server.
Sander Striker wrote:
My second attempt at preparing a 2.0.50 rc tarball...
I've tagged the tree (STRIKER_2_0_50_RC2) and uploaded associated
tarballs to:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Please test and report.
The tarball refuses to build as an RPM.
The attached patch fixes this.
I need one
Jeff Trawick wrote:
--- build/rpm/httpd.spec.in2004-02-07 20:44:30.0 +0200
+++ httpd.spec.in2004-06-24 19:25:19.0 +0200
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
License: Apache License, Version 2.0
Group: System Environment/Daemons
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-root
-BuildPrereq:
At 12:33 PM 6/24/2004, Graham Leggett wrote:
Sander Striker wrote:
My second attempt at preparing a 2.0.50 rc tarball...
I've tagged the tree (STRIKER_2_0_50_RC2) and uploaded associated
tarballs to:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Please test and report.
The tarball refuses to build as an
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Graham, silly question. When it deploys as an RPM, do we also copy
LICENSE and NOTICE to some appropriate spot? This tripped me in
the latest updates - was moving the LICENSE and not NOTICE in the
time since that second file was introduced.
Just checked: Neither our
At 01:18 PM 6/24/2004, Graham Leggett wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Graham, silly question. When it deploys as an RPM, do we also copy
LICENSE and NOTICE to some appropriate spot? This tripped me in
the latest updates - was moving the LICENSE and not NOTICE in the
time since that second
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Heh, maybe they don't. In the win32 installer and build system we drop them
into the target directory, alongside the bin, htdocs, modules directories.
On unix, we do toss LICENSE into $target/manual/ - but we are missing
NOTICE in the build system. Perhaps that's the
Referring to our own license's redistribution requirements;
4. Redistribution. You may reproduce and distribute copies of the Work or Derivative
Works thereof in any medium, with or without modifications, and in Source or Object
form, provided that You meet the following conditions:
* You
Hello,
I have taken the sources as tagged in CSV and tried it to build under
Windows 2000.
It fails when compiling xlate.c to generate libaprutil
xlate.c
c:\Develop\Apache\httpd-2.0.50-rc1\srclib\apr-util\xlate\xlate.c(181) :
error C2
198: 'apr_iconv_close' : Nicht genuegend Parameter
On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 10:09:39PM +0200, Sander Striker wrote:
Hi,
My second attempt at preparing a 2.0.50 rc tarball...
I've tagged the tree (STRIKER_2_0_50_RC2) and uploaded associated
tarballs to:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Please test and report.
Asside from a little
Sander Striker wrote:
Hi,
My second attempt at preparing a 2.0.50 rc tarball...
I've tagged the tree (STRIKER_2_0_50_RC2) and uploaded associated
tarballs to:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Please test and report.
looks good to me on AIX 5.1 and Solaris 9...
Sander Striker wrote:
Hi,
My second attempt at preparing a 2.0.50 rc tarball...
I've tagged the tree (STRIKER_2_0_50_RC2) and uploaded associated
tarballs to:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Please test and report.
plays nice with mod_perl-2.0 on fedora core 1. also plays
On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 10:09:39PM +0200, Sander Striker wrote:
Hi,
My second attempt at preparing a 2.0.50 rc tarball...
OK, I'll be more direct now (my last mail to this list has apparently
been ignored). Can you please try to get this:
Tom Alsberg wrote:
On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 10:09:39PM +0200, Sander Striker wrote:
Hi,
My second attempt at preparing a 2.0.50 rc tarball...
OK, I'll be more direct now (my last mail to this list has apparently
been ignored). Can you please try to get this:
On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 08:42:14 +0200, Andre Schild wrote:
Hello,
It fails when compiling xlate.c to generate libaprutil
xlate.c
c:\Develop\Apache\httpd-2.0.50-rc1\srclib\apr-util\xlate\xlate.c(181) :
error C2
198: 'apr_iconv_close' : Nicht genuegend Parameter uebergeben
On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 11:30:22AM -0400, Geoffrey Young wrote:
the process for adding new features to Apache 2.0 is to first integrate the
feature into Apache 2.1 (cvs HEAD). after that, the feature is voted upon
for inclusion in the stable 2.0 branch.
Yes, I understand that...
So to ask
On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 20:12:02 +0300, Tom Alsberg wrote:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 11:30:22AM -0400, Geoffrey Young wrote:
So to ask differently: Any work in progress to get this into the
2.1-HEAD branch? I just don't want that patch to sit there dead.
Given that nobody has said so much
Hello Eddie,
198: 'apr_iconv_open' : Nicht genuegend Parameter uebergeben
c:\Develop\Apache\httpd-2.0.50-rc1\srclib\apr-util\xlate\xlate.c(182) :
warning
C4047: '=' : Anzahl der Dereferenzierungen bei 'void *' und 'int '
unterschiedli
ch
Are you sure you have the rc2 tag? it looks like you
At 12:12 PM 6/23/2004, Tom Alsberg wrote:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 11:30:22AM -0400, Geoffrey Young wrote:
the process for adding new features to Apache 2.0 is to first integrate the
feature into Apache 2.1 (cvs HEAD). after that, the feature is voted upon
for inclusion in the stable 2.0
I just commited a fix for this.
Bill
Andre Schild wrote:
Hello,
I have taken the sources as tagged in CSV and tried it to build under
Windows 2000.
It fails when compiling xlate.c to generate libaprutil
xlate.c
c:\Develop\Apache\httpd-2.0.50-rc1\srclib\apr-util\xlate\xlate.c(181) :
error C2
198:
On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 13:29:21 -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
My only confusion is what your patch for AllowOverrideOptions does, that
AllowOverride doesn't accomplish. I've too few cycles to dig deeply, but
could you provide a trivial example?
From reading the bug report, Tom's patch
It compiles and works without any problems on SuSE 9.0 Professional (with
MPM prefork).
Sascha
- Original Message -
From: Sander Striker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2004 10:09 PM
Subject: Apache HTTP Server
26 matches
Mail list logo
