On Sep 13, 2012, at 4:28 PM, Roy T. Fielding field...@gbiv.com wrote:
Regardless, I am +0 to revert, for none of the above reasons.
I am not fond of the performance hit of checking for a browser
version and setting an environment variable, just to support a
standard that is not being
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 7:48 AM, Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 3:51 AM, field...@apache.org wrote:
Author: fielding
Date: Sat Aug 11 07:51:52 2012
New Revision: 1371878
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1371878view=rev
Log:
Apache does not tolerate
On 09/13/2012 03:27 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 7:48 AM, Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 3:51 AM, field...@apache.org wrote:
Author: fielding
Date: Sat Aug 11 07:51:52 2012
New Revision: 1371878
URL:
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 3:51 AM, field...@apache.org wrote:
Author: fielding
Date: Sat Aug 11 07:51:52 2012
New Revision: 1371878
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1371878view=rev
Log:
Apache does not tolerate
I think we are all in agreement, however, that MS is
violating the standard... are we not?
With that as a given, do we Do Nothing? I don't think so;
We shouldn't, by action or inaction, permit violations. Now,
with that as a given, the question is How Do We Respond.
At the very least, the commit
On Sep 13, 2012 7:48 AM, Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 3:51 AM, field...@apache.org wrote:
Author: fielding
Date: Sat Aug 11 07:51:52 2012
New Revision: 1371878
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1371878view=rev
Log:
Apache does not tolerate
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 12:31 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
I think we are all in agreement, however, that MS is
violating the standard... are we not?
With that as a given, do we Do Nothing? I don't think so;
We shouldn't, by action or inaction, permit violations. Now,
with that
On 13 Sep 2012, at 18:24, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't think it is a transparency issue so much as a poor choice of
venues for airing the disagreement. We've put something in the .conf
file that many administrators will need to remove and almost none will
have a need to
On Sep 13, 2012, at 1:24 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 12:31 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
I think we are all in agreement, however, that MS is
violating the standard... are we not?
With that as a given, do we Do Nothing? I don't think so;
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 1:33 PM, Tim Bannister is...@jellybaby.net wrote:
On 13 Sep 2012, at 18:24, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't think it is a transparency issue so much as a poor choice of
venues for airing the disagreement. We've put something in the .conf
file that many
On Sep 13, 2012, at 4:48 AM, Eric Covener wrote:
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 3:51 AM, field...@apache.org wrote:
Author: fielding
Date: Sat Aug 11 07:51:52 2012
New Revision: 1371878
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1371878view=rev
Log:
Apache does not tolerate deliberate abuse of open
11 matches
Mail list logo
