To take this discussion all the way back to APR project's potential
concerns...
On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 8:03 AM Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> > On Mar 13, 2019, at 8:56 AM, Nick Kew wrote:
> >
> >> On 13 Mar 2019, at 12:43, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> >>
> >> Is there anyone else building 2.4 on macOS
> On Mar 13, 2019, at 11:04 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
>
>
> As you can see, you didn't modify only modules/filters/ ... Maybe you
> meant to modify MOD_CPPFLAGS, as modules/http2/modules.mak does?
>
If that will solve the issue I'm all for it!
Thx.
Just as a reminder of what r1850745 actually did, from an old discussion;
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 5:09 PM William A Rowe Jr
wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 3:54 PM Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>> I'm sorry but I'm confused. The patch is as specific as you can get. It
>> just adds the minimal option
On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 8:04 AM Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> Yeah, I also think it depends on the version of clang... previous versions
> did not flag
>
> /usr/local/include/unicode/uenum.h:1:1: error: // comments are not
> allowed in this language [-Werror,-Wcomment]
>
> as fatal errors.
Just
> On Mar 13, 2019, at 8:51 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 1:45 PM Eric Covener wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 8:43 AM Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>>
>>> Is there anyone else building 2.4 on macOS under maintainer-mode
>>> who is also being affected by the above? The
It's libxml2 from MacPorts... which is basically vanilla libxml2.
APR is 1.6.x
> On Mar 13, 2019, at 8:56 AM, Nick Kew wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 13 Mar 2019, at 12:43, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>
>> Is there anyone else building 2.4 on macOS under maintainer-mode
>> who is also being affected by the
> On 13 Mar 2019, at 12:43, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> Is there anyone else building 2.4 on macOS under maintainer-mode
> who is also being affected by the above? The fact that I seem to
> be the anyone "complaining" :) seems weird...
>
> Thx!
Just out of interest, is that with a
On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 1:45 PM Eric Covener wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 8:43 AM Jim Jagielski wrote:
> >
> > Is there anyone else building 2.4 on macOS under maintainer-mode
> > who is also being affected by the above? The fact that I seem to
> > be the anyone "complaining" :) seems
On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 8:43 AM Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> Is there anyone else building 2.4 on macOS under maintainer-mode
> who is also being affected by the above? The fact that I seem to
> be the anyone "complaining" :) seems weird...
FWIW Looks like I have maintainer mode but not libxml2
