Cliff Woolley wrote:
On Mon, 24 Nov 2003, Robert La Ferla wrote:
In the interim, it would be nice to see some mention of a workaround on
the site for users.
Done. Let me know if you think that there are more details I could add
that would be helpful.
--Cliff
You guys are great!
On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 12:54:05AM -0500, Robert La Ferla wrote:
I have no problem with running release candidates and contributing. I
have contributed in the past by the way... In fact, I wouldn't object
to trying nightly or weekly builds. The problem is that I don't see
those as easily
On Sun, Nov 23, 2003 at 10:13:09PM -0500, Robert La Ferla wrote:
What testing gets performed prior to an official httpd 2.x release? I
think whatever test suite is used, needs some updating to include
configurations that utilize more features like user tracking, caching
and multi-views.
-
From: Cliff Woolley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2003 10:23 PM
To: Robert La Ferla
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Release Frequency and Testing
On Sun, 23 Nov 2003, Robert La Ferla wrote:
What testing gets performed prior to an official httpd 2.x release? I
Manni Wood wrote:
Yeah, I have to take responsibility for this bug. Apologies to all. Fans
of irony will appreciate that I unwittingly introduced this new bug
while solving a long-standing cookie header parsing bug! Ouch...
May be it's a good time to remove the cookie handling from the core and
What testing gets performed prior to an official httpd 2.x release? I
think whatever test suite is used, needs some updating to include
configurations that utilize more features like user tracking, caching
and multi-views. The last release (2.0.48) crashes on startup for my
configuration
On Sun, 23 Nov 2003, Robert La Ferla wrote:
What testing gets performed prior to an official httpd 2.x release? I
think whatever test suite is used, needs some updating to include
configurations that utilize more features like user tracking, caching
and multi-views. The last release
I hope the response does not diminish your enthusiasm...
The [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list (you can join up with a mail
to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) maintains the mod_specweb and
the perl-framework websites. I believe that flood is seperate at this point.
Please - subscribe and contribute! The
I have no problem with running release candidates and contributing. I
have contributed in the past by the way... In fact, I wouldn't object
to trying nightly or weekly builds. The problem is that I don't see
those as easily available from the httpd.apache.org website. There is a
link to
On Mon, 24 Nov 2003, Robert La Ferla wrote:
link to the latest source tree but the source code there does not have a
configure script. Yes, I can build the script (autoconf?) but if you
want people to test software on a regular basis, it would be better to
have a ready to go source release
On Mon, 24 Nov 2003, Robert La Ferla wrote:
In the interim, it would be nice to see some mention of a workaround on
the site for users.
Done. Let me know if you think that there are more details I could add
that would be helpful.
--Cliff
11 matches
Mail list logo
