On 2015-06-16 13:39, Yann Ylavic wrote:
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 7:24 PM, olli hauer oha...@gmx.de wrote:
As a side note, even I've read the Release Notes I was thankful to see my
console was trashed with the deprecation warning ;)
What I miss is a section on httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/ with
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 7:24 PM, olli hauer oha...@gmx.de wrote:
As a side note, even I've read the Release Notes I was thankful to see my
console was trashed with the deprecation warning ;)
What I miss is a section on httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/ with a link list what
has changed since
On 2015-06-15 03:36, Gregg Smith wrote:
On 6/14/2015 6:14 PM, Gregg Smith wrote:
On 6/14/2015 2:56 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Gregg Smithg...@gknw.net wrote:
http://people.apache.org/~gsmith/proposal/sslcertificatechainfile_compromise.diff
I'm fine with this
On 6/14/2015 2:54 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 11:29 AM,gsm...@apache.org wrote:
Author: gsmith
Date: Sun Jun 14 09:29:50 2015
New Revision: 1685371
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1685371
Log:
-1 vote w/ comment
Modified:
httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
Modified:
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 11:29 AM, gsm...@apache.org wrote:
Author: gsmith
Date: Sun Jun 14 09:29:50 2015
New Revision: 1685371
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1685371
Log:
-1 vote w/ comment
Modified:
httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
URL:
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Gregg Smith g...@gknw.net wrote:
http://people.apache.org/~gsmith/proposal/sslcertificatechainfile_compromise.diff
I'm fine with this approach too.
We have to decide whether a single [warn] is acceptable or not since
it may still confuse startup monitors, which
On 6/14/2015 6:14 PM, Gregg Smith wrote:
On 6/14/2015 2:56 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Gregg Smithg...@gknw.net wrote:
http://people.apache.org/~gsmith/proposal/sslcertificatechainfile_compromise.diff
I'm fine with this approach too.
We have to decide whether a
On 6/14/2015 2:56 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Gregg Smithg...@gknw.net wrote:
http://people.apache.org/~gsmith/proposal/sslcertificatechainfile_compromise.diff
I'm fine with this approach too.
We have to decide whether a single [warn] is acceptable or not since
it
