On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 17:41:31 -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would also propose we drop apr_xlate and mod_charset_lite if the
only way to support this is GNU iconv, which incompatible with the
ASL.
Various platforms have non-GNU iconv() which is suitiable for use by
At 05:32 AM 3/30/2005, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 17:41:31 -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would also propose we drop apr_xlate and mod_charset_lite if the
only way to support this is GNU iconv, which incompatible with the
ASL.
Various platforms have
The STATUS file says:
2.1.4 : in development
2.1.3 : Released on 2/22/2005 as alpha.
The ap_release.h header file says:
2.1.5-dev
The distribution page /dist/httpd says:
httpd-2.1.3-beta.tar.gz
Are we BETA yet or not? I am assuming that the true status is:
-
--On Tuesday, March 29, 2005 11:22 AM -0700 Brad Nicholes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are we BETA yet or not? I am assuming that the true status is:
OtherBill has consistently repeated that he will -1 anything entering beta.
So, until he resolves his issues, we're at a standstill.
My current
Brad Nicholes wrote:
The STATUS file says:
2.1.4 : in development
I was tagged as alpha. It sort of died, because of problems in
apr-iconv. The Status file should be updated.
2.1.3 : Released on 2/22/2005 as alpha.
It had enough votes for beta, but I am not sure on the RM's
2.1.3 : Released on 2/22/2005 as alpha.
It had enough votes for beta, but I am not sure on the RM's decision.
It isn't the RM's decision. A majority vote of the PMC is a decision
to release provided there are at least three +1s. The RM is just the
person doing the heavy lifting.
Roy
At 12:40 PM 3/29/2005, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On Tuesday, March 29, 2005 11:22 AM -0700 Brad Nicholes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Are we BETA yet or not? I am assuming that the true status is:
OtherBill has consistently repeated that he will -1 anything entering beta.
So, until he resolves
On Mar 29, 2005, at 1:36 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
to remove his -1. Every time I have tried to remove his stated
arguments against going beta (I lost count at 4 different rationales
against beta), OtherBill suddenly presents more arguments as to why
httpd can't enter beta.
Justin, your
At 05:08 PM 3/29/2005, Roy T.Fielding wrote:
On Mar 29, 2005, at 1:36 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote
Bill, why don't you just fix whatever it is that you think of as
broken rather than send negative votes?
The last release simply came to quickly between announce of the
intent and the tarball.
