Re: State of mod_auth_digest?

2009-07-10 Thread Dan Poirier
Joe Orton jor...@redhat.com writes: On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 09:46:39AM -0400, Dan Poirier wrote: I was looking at mod_auth_digest and bug 16057. Currently the shared memory code in that module is disabled, and it turns out that has effects throughout the module, such as disabling all client

Re: State of mod_auth_digest?

2009-07-10 Thread Chris Darroch
Dan Poirier wrote: I've added a patch to bug 16057 to replace the use of shared memory with socache. I was hoping the changes would be less pervasive, but the shared memory assumption showed up in a lot of places. Comments on the proposed changes would be more than welcome. Can't wait to

Re: State of mod_auth_digest?

2009-06-12 Thread Joe Orton
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 09:46:39AM -0400, Dan Poirier wrote: I was looking at mod_auth_digest and bug 16057. Currently the shared memory code in that module is disabled, and it turns out that has effects throughout the module, such as disabling all client tracking, nonce-count checking,

State of mod_auth_digest?

2009-06-11 Thread Dan Poirier
I was looking at mod_auth_digest and bug 16057. Currently the shared memory code in that module is disabled, and it turns out that has effects throughout the module, such as disabling all client tracking, nonce-count checking, MD5-sess, and probably other things. I wonder if this does anything