On 11/15/2008 09:50 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Not that much time has passed since we released 2.2.10 (one month), but
I would like to see a release of 2.2.11 in the near future.
Why?
2.2.10 has two regressions, one against 2.2.8 (crashes caused by the
proxy) which is already backported and
On Nov 15, 2008, at 3:50 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Not that much time has passed since we released 2.2.10 (one month),
but
I would like to see a release of 2.2.11 in the near future.
Why?
2.2.10 has two regressions, one against 2.2.8 (crashes caused by the
proxy) which is already backported
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 11/15/2008 09:50 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Not that much time has passed since we released 2.2.10 (one month), but
I would like to see a release of 2.2.11 in the near future.
Why?
2.2.10 has two regressions, one against 2.2.8 (crashes caused by the
proxy) which is
ess Holle schrieb:
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 11/15/2008 09:50 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Given the positive feedback: Please vote now on the backports :-).
I /really/ want to see a sub-second proxy connection timeout as this is
needed due to Windows' inappropriate RFC interpretation. This
Cool. Thanks!
I'll anxiously await 2.2.11 then.
Rainer Jung wrote:
Jess Holle schrieb:
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 11/15/2008 09:50 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Given the positive feedback: Please vote now on the backports :-).
I /really/ want to see a sub-second proxy
Not that much time has passed since we released 2.2.10 (one month), but
I would like to see a release of 2.2.11 in the near future.
Why?
2.2.10 has two regressions, one against 2.2.8 (crashes caused by the
proxy) which is already backported and one against 2.2.9 (errors in
openssl detection) which
I'd prefere to have stable bug free (well as little as possible) release,
New feature are nice, but they can wait IMHO.
Just my 2 cents
~Jorge
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 9:50 PM, Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not that much time has passed since we released 2.2.10 (one month), but
I
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Not that much time has passed since we released 2.2.10 (one month), but
I would like to see a release of 2.2.11 in the near future.
Why?
2.2.10 has two regressions, one against 2.2.8 (crashes caused by the
proxy) which is already backported and one against 2.2.9 (errors
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Not that much time has passed since we released 2.2.10 (one month), but
I would like to see a release of 2.2.11 in the near future.
+1.
Release early, release often.
Regards,
Graham
--
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Not that much time has passed since we released 2.2.10 (one month), but
I would like to see a release of 2.2.11 in the near future.
+1
Regards
--
^(TM)
10 matches
Mail list logo
