On 5/5/23 2:37 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
> Down-thread, Giovanni asks about security patch handling. We can continue to
> use repos/private/pmc/httpd/ for that. That area will
> not go away. If people want to go "all git", then Infra can provide projects
> with a single, private repository that
On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 1:45 AM Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>...
> 2. Switching from Subversion to Git is mostly an emotional problem for me.
> We have some closer ties to Subversion by some
>overlaps in the community and via mod_dav_svn we kind of partially eat
> our very own dogfood here by
On Wed, May 03, 2023 at 02:31:35PM -0500, Daniel Gruno wrote:
> I am +1 on moving. I do not have any particular love for git or svn on their
> own, and I realize that the proposed change does make outside contributions
> and certain workflows easier.
+1 for the same reasons here. Might be better
On 5/3/23 23:03, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
Le 03/05/2023 à 21:12, Eric Covener a écrit :
On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 2:45 PM Graham Leggett via dev
wrote:
On 25 Apr 2023, at 07:45, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
2. Switching from Subversion to Git is mostly an emotional problem for me. We
have some
4.05.2023 10:25 tarihinde Stefan Eissing via dev yazdı:
Am 03.05.2023 um 23:03 schrieb Christophe JAILLET
:
Le 03/05/2023 à 21:12, Eric Covener a écrit :
On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 2:45 PM Graham Leggett via dev
wrote:
On 25 Apr 2023, at 07:45, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
2. Switching from
> Am 03.05.2023 um 23:03 schrieb Christophe JAILLET
> :
>
> Le 03/05/2023 à 21:12, Eric Covener a écrit :
>> On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 2:45 PM Graham Leggett via dev
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 25 Apr 2023, at 07:45, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>>>
>>> 2. Switching from Subversion to Git is mostly an
Le 03/05/2023 à 21:12, Eric Covener a écrit :
On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 2:45 PM Graham Leggett via dev
wrote:
On 25 Apr 2023, at 07:45, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
2. Switching from Subversion to Git is mostly an emotional problem for me. We
have some closer ties to Subversion by some
overlaps
On 2023-05-03 14:12, Eric Covener wrote:
On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 2:45 PM Graham Leggett via dev
wrote:
On 25 Apr 2023, at 07:45, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
2. Switching from Subversion to Git is mostly an emotional problem for me. We
have some closer ties to Subversion by some
overlaps in
On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 2:45 PM Graham Leggett via dev
wrote:
>
> On 25 Apr 2023, at 07:45, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>
> 2. Switching from Subversion to Git is mostly an emotional problem for me. We
> have some closer ties to Subversion by some
> overlaps in the community and via mod_dav_svn we
On 25 Apr 2023, at 07:45, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
> 2. Switching from Subversion to Git is mostly an emotional problem for me. We
> have some closer ties to Subversion by some
> overlaps in the community and via mod_dav_svn we kind of partially eat our
> very own dogfood here by using
Get over the heartache and brand loyalty and get on rw git. Github isn't
the only game in town anymore for git hosting, so don't feel trapped by
infra just because it's all they've got in the tank.
On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 2:07 PM Eric Covener wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 2:45 AM Ruediger
On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 2:45 AM Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>
>
>
> On 4/12/23 2:02 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 1:31 PM Eric Covener wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 6:36 AM Yann Ylavic wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 12:26 PM Yann Ylavic wrote:
>
>
On 4/12/23 2:02 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 1:31 PM Eric Covener wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 6:36 AM Yann Ylavic wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 12:26 PM Yann Ylavic wrote:
On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 12:18 PM ylavic wrote:
>
> @ylavic
On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 1:31 PM Eric Covener wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 6:36 AM Yann Ylavic wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 12:26 PM Yann Ylavic wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 12:18 PM ylavic wrote:
> > > >
> > > > @ylavic approved this pull request.
> > > >
> > > >
On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 6:36 AM Yann Ylavic wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 12:26 PM Yann Ylavic wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 12:18 PM ylavic wrote:
> > >
> > > @ylavic approved this pull request.
> > >
> > > Three approvals to get ci started?
> >
> > Nope.. It seems that gh
On 4/12/23 12:35 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 12:26 PM Yann Ylavic wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 12:18 PM ylavic wrote:
>>>
>>> @ylavic approved this pull request.
>>>
>>> Three approvals to get ci started?
>>
>> Nope.. It seems that gh actions don't run for PRs
On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 12:26 PM Yann Ylavic wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 12:18 PM ylavic wrote:
> >
> > @ylavic approved this pull request.
> >
> > Three approvals to get ci started?
>
> Nope.. It seems that gh actions don't run for PRs whatever we do.
> The docs[1] say that there should
On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 12:18 PM ylavic wrote:
>
> @ylavic approved this pull request.
>
> Three approvals to get ci started?
Nope.. It seems that gh actions don't run for PRs whatever we do.
The docs[1] say that there should be an "Approve and run" button near
the "workflow awaiting approval"
18 matches
Mail list logo
