Re: hot standby in proxy added

2006-07-12 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , VF EITO
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Jim Jagielski Gesendet: Mittwoch, 12. Juli 2006 00:55 An: dev@httpd.apache.org Betreff: Re: hot standby in proxy added My thoughts are how to make this better; overloading the concept of disabled workers to mean multiple things depending

Re: hot standby in proxy added

2006-07-12 Thread Jim Jagielski
Rainer Jung wrote: Jim Jagielski schrieb: Ruediger Pluem wrote: On 07/11/2006 10:41 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: The hot-standby worker is the last resort if the site would be otherwise dead. The hot-standby worker can be used e.g. to display a maintenance page or a simpler

Re: hot standby in proxy added

2006-07-12 Thread Rainer Jung
Jim Jagielski schrieb: Yes, and that's why it's confusing. I can also see cases where you would want a hot-standby available at the same distance as well (check to see if there's a hot standby first, before checking hosts at a greater distance). You are totally right, I missed that one.

Re: hot standby in proxy added

2006-07-12 Thread Jim Jagielski
Rainer Jung wrote: I'm not totally happy with mod_jk, because it grew over a long time, whenever a special new use case appeared, but it lacks consistency of configurations options and how they interact. :) That's the nice thing about the proxy module is that we're able to start from

hot standby in proxy added

2006-07-11 Thread Jim Jagielski
I've folded in my impl of hot-standby for proxy workers... check out trunk. I'm sure there is tuning to be done, but it's a functional impl that minimizes the code touched.

Re: hot standby in proxy added

2006-07-11 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 07/11/2006 10:41 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: I've folded in my impl of hot-standby for proxy workers... check out trunk. I'm sure there is tuning to be done, but it's a functional impl that minimizes the code touched. Just to be sure that I got the correct understanding of the hot-standby

Re: hot standby in proxy added

2006-07-11 Thread Jim Jagielski
Ruediger Pluem wrote: On 07/11/2006 10:41 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: I've folded in my impl of hot-standby for proxy workers... check out trunk. I'm sure there is tuning to be done, but it's a functional impl that minimizes the code touched. Just to be sure that I got the correct

Re: hot standby in proxy added

2006-07-11 Thread Rainer Jung
Jim Jagielski schrieb: Ruediger Pluem wrote: On 07/11/2006 10:41 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: The hot-standby worker is the last resort if the site would be otherwise dead. The hot-standby worker can be used e.g. to display a maintenance page or a simpler version of the site or if you can